OCR A-Level Religious Studies H573
Philosophy of Religion
Religion and Ethics
Developments in Christian ThoughtReligion
Developments in Islamic ThoughtReligion
Developments in Jewish ThoughtReligion
Developments in Buddhist ThoughtReligion
Developments in Hindu ThoughtReligion
Philosophy of Religion
Eternity, foreknowledge and free will
- 3 things to know
- Component 1
Overview
Recall questions on the problem of divine foreknowledge and human freedom, eternal and everlasting models of God, Boethius on eternity and simple and conditional necessity, Anselm's four-dimensionalist approach, Swinburne's everlasting God and qualified omniscience, the criticisms of each, and libertarian and compatibilist free will.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Why does the foreknowledge problem also threaten divine benevolence and justice?
Explain Anselm's distinction between preceding and subsequent necessity.
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
How does Boethius reconcile divine foreknowledge with free will?
Model answer
He argues God is eternal rather than everlasting, seeing all time at once, so God's knowledge is observation rather than foreknowledge.
- 2
What is Swinburne's view of God's relationship to time?
Model answer
That God is everlasting, existing through time rather than outside it, and does not know future free choices because they are not yet there to be known.
- 3
Set out the problem of divine foreknowledge and human freedom.
Model answer
If God knew before you were born exactly what you would choose today, then it was true before you were born that you would choose it. If it was already true and God's knowledge cannot be mistaken, then you could not have chosen otherwise. If you could not have chosen otherwise, your choice was not free. So it seems that infallible foreknowledge and genuine human freedom cannot both be real.
- 4
Why does the foreknowledge problem also threaten divine benevolence and justice?
Model answer
Because reward and punishment presuppose that people could have acted differently. If God's knowledge fixes what everyone will do, then those who are condemned were never able to avoid it, and a God who created them knowing this and then judged them would be neither just nor loving. The problem therefore is not merely about freedom in the abstract but about whether divine judgement can be fair at all.
- 5
What are the two main models of divine eternity?
Model answer
On the timeless model, God exists outside time altogether, with no before or after in the divine life, and all moments of history are equally present to him. On the everlasting model, God exists throughout time without beginning or end, experiencing succession as we do but never coming into being or ceasing. The first protects immutability and solves the foreknowledge problem in one way; the second protects a God who responds and acts.
- 6
How does Boethius define eternity?
Model answer
He defines it as the possession of unending life all at once and completely, and contrasts it with everlastingness. A being that merely lasts for ever still lives its life a moment at a time, losing the past and awaiting the future. God, by contrast, holds the whole of his life in a single, complete present, which is why Boethius denies that God is merely very long-lived.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Philosophy of Religion, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.