Edexcel A-Level Religious Studies 9RS0
Philosophy of ReligionPaper
Religion and EthicsPaper
New Testament StudiesPaper
BuddhismReligion
ChristianityReligion
HinduismReligion
IslamReligion
JudaismReligion
SikhismReligion
Religion and Ethics
Comparing Kant and Aristotle
- 3 things to know
- Paper 2
Overview
Recall questions on duty against character, the place of emotion, how each grounds moral authority, and where each is strongest.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
How do Kant and Aristotle differ on the place of emotion?
How does each thinker treat the emotions in moral life?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What is the basic difference in what each theory asks?
Model answer
Kant asks what I ought to do, and answers with a test applied to the maxim of an action. Aristotle asks what sort of person I should become, and answers with an account of character developed over a lifetime. One is act-centred, the other agent-centred, and they can approve the same action for entirely different reasons.
- 2
Which offers more practical guidance?
Model answer
Kant supplies a decision procedure that can be applied by anyone with reason, which is why his approach translates into codes, rights and law. Aristotle supplies no algorithm, relying on practical wisdom formed by experience, which is realistic about hard cases but unhelpful to someone who lacks that formation. So Kant is stronger on determinacy, Aristotle on sensitivity to particulars.
- 3
How compatible is each with religious approaches?
Model answer
Aristotle was absorbed into Christian ethics by Aquinas, who added the theological virtues, so virtue language sits easily with traditions that speak of formation, discipleship and the shaping of character; the friction is that eudaimonia is this-worldly and Aristotle's great-souled man, conscious of his own worth, sits awkwardly beside Christian humility. Kant's insistence on autonomy conflicts with divine command ethics, since a law received from God would be heteronomous, yet his postulates of God and immortality and his account of human dignity have been widely used by religious ethicists.
- 4
How do the two show up in law and social change?
Model answer
The duty-based approach lies behind rights instruments, anti-discrimination law and the requirement of consent, all of which protect individuals against being traded off for aggregate benefit. The virtue approach shows in character education in schools, professional codes framed around integrity and compassion rather than rules, and restorative justice, which asks what will reform an offender rather than only what punishment the act deserves.
- 5
What is the central difference between Kant's ethics and Aristotle's?
Model answer
Kant asks what duty requires of an action, Aristotle asks what character a person should become.
- 6
How does each thinker treat the emotions in moral life?
Model answer
Kant holds that acting from inclination gives an act no moral worth, while Aristotle holds that the virtuous person feels the right emotion at the right time.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Religion and Ethics, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.