OCR A-Level Law H418
Civil Courts and Other Forms of Dispute Resolution
Criminal Courts and Lay People
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice
Rules and Theory of Criminal Law
General Elements of Criminal Liability
Fatal Offences Against the Person
Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person
Offences Against Property
Mental Capacity Defences
Preliminary Offences
Evaluation in Criminal Law
Parliamentary Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
European Union Law
Rules and Theory of Tort
Liability in Negligence
Occupiers’ Liability
Torts Connected to Land
Vicarious Liability
Defences
Remedies in Tort
Evaluation in Tort
Introduction to the Nature of Law
Law and Society
Rules and Theory of Human RightsHuman rights
Protection of the Individual’s Human Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Key Provisions of the European Convention on Human RightsHuman rights
Human Rights and English LawHuman rights
Enforcement of Human Rights LawHuman rights
Evaluation in Human RightsHuman rights
Rules and Theory of ContractContract
FormationContract
Vitiating FactorsContract
Remedies in ContractContract
Evaluation in ContractContract
Defences
Defences in tort
- 6 things to know
- Component 2
Overview
Recall questions on volenti non fit injuria, including knowledge and voluntary acceptance of risk, Smith v Baker, employees, passengers under section 149 Road Traffic Act 1988, rescuers and sport, on contributory negligence under the 1945 Act and the reduction of damages, and on the illegality defence.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Why must a claimant's acceptance of risk be voluntary for volenti, and how does that affect employees?
What must be shown for the defence of contributory negligence?
What is the defence of volenti non fit injuria in negligence?
Can agreement to risk for volenti purposes be implied, or must it always be express?
What level of knowledge must a claimant have for volenti to apply?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What is the defence of volenti non fit injuria in negligence?
Model answer
A complete defence where the claimant voluntarily agreed to accept the risk of harm that materialised.
- 2
Can agreement to risk for volenti purposes be implied, or must it always be express?
Model answer
Agreement can be either express or implied.
- 3
What is the effect on a claim if volenti is successfully established?
Model answer
It provides a complete bar to the claim, meaning the claimant recovers nothing.
- 4
What level of knowledge must a claimant have for volenti to apply?
Model answer
The claimant must have full knowledge of the nature and extent of the risk.
- 5
Is general awareness of danger sufficient for volenti, or must the claimant know something more specific?
Model answer
The claimant must have knowledge of the specific risk that materialised, not merely general awareness of danger.
- 6
What must the claimant do regarding the risk for volenti to succeed?
Model answer
The claimant must voluntarily agree to accept that risk.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Defences, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.