levo

Torts Connected to Land

Private nuisance

  • 4 things to know
  • Component 2

Overview

Recall questions on private nuisance: who can sue after Hunter v Canary Wharf and who can be sued, the types of nuisance, the factors deciding unreasonable interference such as locality, sensitivity, duration and malice, the defences and non-defences to nuisance, and damages, abatement and injunctions as nuisance remedies.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

How do act of God, coming to the nuisance and planning permission operate in private nuisance?

Key term

What is abatement as a remedy for private nuisance?

Key term

What type of interest must a claimant have in the affected land to bring a claim in private nuisance?

Key term

How might a nuisance consist of physical damage to land?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    How is private nuisance defined as a tort?

    Model answer

    Private nuisance is a tort involving unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land, or some right over or in connection with it.

  2. 2

    What type of interest must a claimant have in the affected land to bring a claim in private nuisance?

    Model answer

    The claimant must have a proprietary interest in the land, meaning ownership or exclusive possession.

  3. 3

    What principle did Hunter v Canary Wharf establish regarding who can sue in private nuisance?

    Model answer

    It established that only those with proprietary interests can sue in private nuisance, excluding mere licensees and family members without such interests.

  4. 4

    What principle did Sturges v Bridgman establish about locality in nuisance?

    Model answer

    It established that what constitutes a nuisance depends on the character of the locality.

  5. 5

    How does the sensitivity of the claimant affect a private nuisance claim?

    Model answer

    Abnormal sensitivity of the claimant or their property will not make an otherwise reasonable activity into a nuisance.

  6. 6

    What did Robinson v Kilvert decide about abnormal sensitivity in nuisance claims?

    Model answer

    Abnormal sensitivity of the claimant or their property will not make an otherwise reasonable activity into a nuisance.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Civil Courts and Other Forms of Dispute Resolution
Criminal Courts and Lay People
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The Council of .
EuropeMinistersJustice

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AThe injury to the claimant's rights is small.
BThe injury is capable of being estimated in money.
CThe injury can be adequately compensated by a small payment.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Royal Assent has not been refused since 1708.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Torts Connected to Land, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.