OCR A-Level Law H418
Civil Courts and Other Forms of Dispute Resolution
Criminal Courts and Lay People
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice
Rules and Theory of Criminal Law
General Elements of Criminal Liability
Fatal Offences Against the Person
Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person
Offences Against Property
Mental Capacity Defences
Preliminary Offences
Evaluation in Criminal Law
Parliamentary Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
European Union Law
Rules and Theory of Tort
Liability in Negligence
Occupiers’ Liability
Torts Connected to Land
Vicarious Liability
Defences
Remedies in Tort
Evaluation in Tort
Introduction to the Nature of Law
Law and Society
Rules and Theory of Human RightsHuman rights
Protection of the Individual’s Human Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Key Provisions of the European Convention on Human RightsHuman rights
Human Rights and English LawHuman rights
Enforcement of Human Rights LawHuman rights
Evaluation in Human RightsHuman rights
Rules and Theory of ContractContract
FormationContract
Vitiating FactorsContract
Remedies in ContractContract
Evaluation in ContractContract
Preliminary Offences
Attempts
- 7 things to know
- Component 1
Overview
Recall questions on the offence of attempt under section 1(1) of the Criminal Attempts Act 1981, the more than merely preparatory test and the roles of judge and jury, conditional intent, and why attempt requires intention as to consequences so that recklessness is not enough.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
When does conduct amount to a criminal attempt?
Why does the law demand intention for attempt, and where can recklessness still suffice?
What does the actus reus of attempt require in terms of the defendant's actions?
What level of mens rea is required for the offence of attempt?
What does 'more than merely preparatory' mean in the context of attempt?
How does the law distinguish between preparation and attempt?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What does the actus reus of attempt require in terms of the defendant's actions?
Model answer
An act that is more than merely preparatory to the commission of the full offence.
- 2
What level of mens rea is required for the offence of attempt?
Model answer
Intention to commit the full offence; recklessness as to a consequence is insufficient even where it would suffice for the full offence, but recklessness as to a circumstance can suffice (R v Khan 1990).
- 3
Why is recklessness as to a consequence insufficient for attempt even when it suffices for the complete offence?
Model answer
Attempt specifically requires intention to commit the full offence. The law demands a higher mental element for inchoate liability than may be required for the substantive offence. Recklessness as to a circumstance can still suffice where it suffices for the full offence (R v Khan 1990).
- 4
What does 'more than merely preparatory' mean in the context of attempt?
Model answer
The defendant must have embarked upon the crime proper, moving beyond planning or preparation into the actual commission of the offence.
- 5
How does the law distinguish between preparation and attempt?
Model answer
Preparation involves planning or getting ready, whereas attempt requires the defendant to have moved from preparation into actually embarking upon the commission of the crime itself.
- 6
Who decides whether an act is more than merely preparatory in a criminal trial?
Model answer
It is a question of fact for the jury, once the judge determines there is sufficient evidence to leave the issue to them.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Preliminary Offences, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.