AQA A-Level Law 7162
The Nature of Law
The European Union and English Law
Legal Personnel and the Judiciary
Access to Justice and Funding
Parliamentary Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
Law Reform
The Civil Courts and Dispute Resolution
The Criminal Courts and Sentencing
Lay People: Magistrates and Juries
Criminal Law: Rules and Theory
General Elements of Liability
Fatal Offences Against the Person
Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person
Property Offences
Preliminary Offences
Criminal Defences
Tort: Rules and Theory
Negligence
Occupiers' Liability
Nuisance and Rylands v Fletcher
Vicarious Liability
Tort: Defences and Remedies
Contract: Rules and TheoryContract
Formation of a ContractContract
Contract TermsContract
Vitiating FactorsContract
Discharge of a ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights in International and UK LawHuman rights
The European Convention ArticlesHuman rights
Restrictions and EnforcementHuman rights
Reform of Human Rights LawHuman rights
Reform of Human Rights Law
Replacing the Human Rights Act
- 5 things to know
- Paper 3
Overview
Recall questions on the reform debate, the sovereignty objection, the concerns about Strasbourg and the case for leaving the framework alone.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What constitutional complication arises from the Human Rights Act 1998's relationship with devolution?
What limitation on rights has been proposed regarding certain categories of claimants?
What is a key debate in the reform of human rights protection in the UK?
What drives the case for reform, and what is said about independence from Strasbourg and accountability?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What is the central question in the debate about reforming human rights protection in the UK?
Model answer
Whether the Human Rights Act 1998 should be kept, amended, or replaced with a domestic Bill of Rights.
- 2
How do critics argue that judicial interpretation of Convention rights affects parliamentary sovereignty?
Model answer
They argue that parliamentary sovereignty is undermined by judicial interpretation of Convention rights, as courts can effectively override or limit the effect of legislation passed by Parliament.
- 3
What concern about the European Court of Human Rights is raised as an argument for replacing the Human Rights Act 1998?
Model answer
The desire to reduce the influence of the European Court of Human Rights on domestic law.
- 4
Why do opponents of replacing the Human Rights Act 1998 argue the current framework is sufficient?
Model answer
Because the Act provides effective protection for fundamental rights within the existing constitutional framework.
- 5
What constitutional complication arises from the Human Rights Act 1998's relationship with devolution?
Model answer
The Act is entrenched in the devolution settlements of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, making repeal constitutionally complex.
- 6
What change to the relationship between UK courts and European jurisprudence has been proposed under a British Bill of Rights?
Model answer
Giving UK courts greater independence from Strasbourg jurisprudence.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Reform of Human Rights Law, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.