AQA A-Level Law 7162
The Nature of Law
The European Union and English Law
Legal Personnel and the Judiciary
Access to Justice and Funding
Parliamentary Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
Law Reform
The Civil Courts and Dispute Resolution
The Criminal Courts and Sentencing
Lay People: Magistrates and Juries
Criminal Law: Rules and Theory
General Elements of Liability
Fatal Offences Against the Person
Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person
Property Offences
Preliminary Offences
Criminal Defences
Tort: Rules and Theory
Negligence
Occupiers' Liability
Nuisance and Rylands v Fletcher
Vicarious Liability
Tort: Defences and Remedies
Contract: Rules and TheoryContract
Formation of a ContractContract
Contract TermsContract
Vitiating FactorsContract
Discharge of a ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights in International and UK LawHuman rights
The European Convention ArticlesHuman rights
Restrictions and EnforcementHuman rights
Reform of Human Rights LawHuman rights
Vicarious Liability
Employment Status and the Close Connection Test
- 4 things to know
- Paper 2
Overview
Recall questions on the economic reality factors, whether any is decisive, what the close connection test decides and liability for intentional wrongs.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
In what circumstances might a religious organisation be vicariously liable for someone who is not technically an employee?
How do courts determine liability when an employee commits a tort while deviating from their duties?
Can liability extend beyond employment, does it cover independent contractors, and what is indemnity?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What does opportunity for profit indicate under the economic reality test?
Model answer
If the worker has the opportunity to profit from sound management of the task beyond a fixed wage, this suggests independent contractor status.
- 2
Is any single factor determinative when courts assess employment status?
Model answer
No. No single factor is conclusive; courts take a holistic approach considering all relevant circumstances.
- 3
What is the close connection test used to determine?
Model answer
Whether a tort was committed in the course of employment by asking whether there was a sufficiently close connection between the wrongful act and the employment.
- 4
Can an employer be vicariously liable for an employee's intentional or criminal wrongdoing?
Model answer
Yes, an employer may be vicariously liable even for intentional wrongdoing, including criminal acts, if there is a sufficiently close connection with the employment.
- 5
Can vicarious liability apply to relationships that are not traditional employment?
Model answer
Yes, vicarious liability can extend to relationships akin to employment, where the relationship shares similar characteristics to employment.
- 6
In what circumstances might a religious organisation be vicariously liable for someone who is not technically an employee?
Model answer
When the relationship between the individual and the organisation is sufficiently analogous to employment, even if no formal employment contract exists.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Vicarious Liability, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.