levo

Foundations in Chemistry

Evaluating results: anomalies, conclusions, limitations and improvements

  • 3 things to know
  • Components 01, 02 and 03

Overview

Recall questions on identifying and excluding anomalous results, drawing and judging conclusions, repeatable and reproducible results, and the limitations and improvements of common experimental procedures.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Process

Titres of 22.45, 21.90 and 21.95 cm³ are recorded. Which should be used to find the mean titre, and what is the mean?

Evaluation

Give a limitation of starting a gas-producing reaction by adding a solid to acid and then replacing the bung, and suggest an improvement.

Key term

What is the difference between repeatable and reproducible results?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What is an anomalous result?

    Model answer

    A value in a set of results that does not fit the pattern or spread of the others and is judged not to be part of their normal variation.

  2. 2

    How can anomalous results be identified?

    Model answer

    By comparing repeat readings of the same measurement, or by spotting points that lie far from the line or curve of best fit on a graph.

  3. 3

    When is it justified to leave an anomalous result out of a calculation?

    Model answer

    When it can be put down to a failure in the procedure or a human error; a result must never be discarded simply because it does not match what was expected.

  4. 4

    Titres of 22.45, 21.90 and 21.95 cm³ are recorded. Which should be used to find the mean titre, and what is the mean?

    Model answer

    22.45 cm³ is anomalous; the concordant titres 21.90 and 21.95 cm³ give a mean titre of 21.925 cm³.

  5. 5

    What should a conclusion drawn from experimental results contain?

    Model answer

    A statement of the pattern or relationship the data show, supported by values from the results and explained using chemical ideas.

  6. 6

    How is the confidence in a conclusion judged?

    Model answer

    From the quality of the evidence: how precise and repeatable the results are, the size of the uncertainties, whether there were anomalies, and whether enough data were collected over a wide enough range.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Foundations in Chemistry
Bonding and Structure
Periodic Table and Energy
Enthalpy Changes

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The order is .
201

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AThe first step is Cl• + O₃ → ClO• + O₂.
BThe second step is ClO• + O → Cl• + O₂.
CThe overall equation is O₃ + O → 2O₂.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

In ClO⁻, chlorine has oxidation number +1.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Foundations in Chemistry, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.