WJEC A-Level Government and Politics 603-1979-3
The British Constitution
The Judiciary and the Supreme Court
The UK Executive
Parliament and the Accountability of Government
Government and the Senedd in Wales
Devolution and the United Kingdom
Citizenship and Rights
The Protection of Human Rights
Democracy and Participation
Electoral Systems in the UK
Voting Behaviour in the UK
Political Parties in Wales and the UK
Pressure Groups and Social Movements
Liberalism
Conservatism
Socialism and Communism
Nationalism
The US Constitution and Federalism
Rights and Liberties in the USA
The US Congress
The US Presidency
The US Supreme Court
US Elections and Voting Behaviour
Political Parties in the USA
Citizenship and Rights
Debates over a British Bill of Rights
- 3 things to know
- AS Unit 2
Overview
Recall questions on what such a measure would change, the 2012 commission, the arguments on both sides, the devolution and Northern Ireland complications, and why entrenchment is difficult.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Why would entrenching a British Bill of Rights be constitutionally difficult?
How would a bill of rights affect the role of judges?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What is a bill of rights?
Model answer
A bill of rights is a single document setting out the fundamental rights of citizens and the limits on what government may do to them.
- 2
What would be new about a British Bill of Rights?
Model answer
It would replace the Human Rights Act with a home-grown statement of rights, drafted in the UK rather than derived from a European treaty.
- 3
What did the commission on a bill of rights conclude in 2012?
Model answer
A majority of its members favoured a UK Bill of Rights that would at least keep the Convention rights, but two members dissented and there was no agreement on what such a bill should contain or whether one was needed at all.
- 4
Give three arguments for replacing the Human Rights Act with a British Bill of Rights.
Model answer
Supporters argue rights would carry greater democratic legitimacy if written domestically, that the balance between rights and responsibilities could be restated, and that additional rights such as jury trial could be included.
- 5
Give three arguments against replacing the Human Rights Act.
Model answer
Opponents argue the existing Act already works, that any replacement is likely to narrow rather than widen protection, and that the change would strain relations with the devolved nations.
- 6
Why does devolution complicate the repeal of the Human Rights Act?
Model answer
Each devolution statute requires devolved legislation and ministers to comply with the Convention rights, so removing the Act would reach into settlements the devolved legislatures would be asked to consent to.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Citizenship and Rights, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.