levo

Rights and Liberties in the USA

Affirmative action and contemporary equality debates

  • 3 things to know
  • A2 Unit 4

Overview

Class-based rather than race-based preference, legacy preference and two areas beyond university admissions where affirmative action has operated.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

What is a legacy preference, and why is it raised in this debate?

Key term

How does the standard of scrutiny shape the affirmative action debate?

Key term

Name two areas beyond university admissions where affirmative action has operated.

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What does an affirmative action programme require of an institution?

    Model answer

    That it takes a protected characteristic into account in admissions, hiring or contracting in order to counteract past and present disadvantage.

  2. 2

    What did Regents of the University of California v Bakke (1978) decide?

    Model answer

    That fixed racial quotas in admissions are unconstitutional, but race may be considered as one factor among many.

  3. 3

    What did Grutter v Bollinger (2003) hold?

    Model answer

    That a law school's individualised consideration of race to obtain the educational benefits of diversity survived strict scrutiny.

  4. 4

    What did Students for Fair Admissions v Harvard (2023) decide?

    Model answer

    That race-conscious admissions programmes at colleges and universities violate the equal protection guarantee.

  5. 5

    Give two arguments in favour of affirmative action.

    Model answer

    That it counteracts the accumulated effects of legally enforced discrimination, and that diverse institutions serve a diverse society better.

  6. 6

    Give two arguments against affirmative action.

    Model answer

    That treating people differently by race is exactly what the equal protection clause forbids, and that it can stigmatise its intended beneficiaries.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

The British Constitution
The Judiciary and the Supreme Court
The UK Executive
Parliament and the Accountability of Government

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

Wyn developed it.
GrantDahlDowns

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AAccess is bought rather than earned.
BWealthy interests are heard disproportionately.
CMuch of it happens where the public cannot see it.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Statute law is enacted by the legislature.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Rights and Liberties in the USA, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.