WJEC A-Level Government and Politics 603-1979-3
The British Constitution
The Judiciary and the Supreme Court
The UK Executive
Parliament and the Accountability of Government
Government and the Senedd in Wales
Devolution and the United Kingdom
Citizenship and Rights
The Protection of Human Rights
Democracy and Participation
Electoral Systems in the UK
Voting Behaviour in the UK
Political Parties in Wales and the UK
Pressure Groups and Social Movements
Liberalism
Conservatism
Socialism and Communism
Nationalism
The US Constitution and Federalism
Rights and Liberties in the USA
The US Congress
The US Presidency
The US Supreme Court
US Elections and Voting Behaviour
Political Parties in the USA
Rights and Liberties in the USA
Affirmative action and contemporary equality debates
- 3 things to know
- A2 Unit 4
Overview
Class-based rather than race-based preference, legacy preference and two areas beyond university admissions where affirmative action has operated.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
How does the standard of scrutiny shape the affirmative action debate?
Name two areas beyond university admissions where affirmative action has operated.
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What does an affirmative action programme require of an institution?
Model answer
That it takes a protected characteristic into account in admissions, hiring or contracting in order to counteract past and present disadvantage.
- 2
What did Regents of the University of California v Bakke (1978) decide?
Model answer
That fixed racial quotas in admissions are unconstitutional, but race may be considered as one factor among many.
- 3
What did Grutter v Bollinger (2003) hold?
Model answer
That a law school's individualised consideration of race to obtain the educational benefits of diversity survived strict scrutiny.
- 4
What did Students for Fair Admissions v Harvard (2023) decide?
Model answer
That race-conscious admissions programmes at colleges and universities violate the equal protection guarantee.
- 5
Give two arguments in favour of affirmative action.
Model answer
That it counteracts the accumulated effects of legally enforced discrimination, and that diverse institutions serve a diverse society better.
- 6
Give two arguments against affirmative action.
Model answer
That treating people differently by race is exactly what the equal protection clause forbids, and that it can stigmatise its intended beneficiaries.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Rights and Liberties in the USA, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.