WJEC A-Level Government and Politics 603-1979-3
The British Constitution
The Judiciary and the Supreme Court
The UK Executive
Parliament and the Accountability of Government
Government and the Senedd in Wales
Devolution and the United Kingdom
Citizenship and Rights
The Protection of Human Rights
Democracy and Participation
Electoral Systems in the UK
Voting Behaviour in the UK
Political Parties in Wales and the UK
Pressure Groups and Social Movements
Liberalism
Conservatism
Socialism and Communism
Nationalism
The US Constitution and Federalism
Rights and Liberties in the USA
The US Congress
The US Presidency
The US Supreme Court
US Elections and Voting Behaviour
Political Parties in the USA
The Protection of Human Rights
Judicial review in practice
- 3 things to know
- AS Unit 2
Overview
Recall questions on the landmark rulings from 1985 to 2023, how a government can respond to defeat, ouster clauses, the 2021 review, and whether review has grown too powerful.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What was decided in the 1985 case concerning trade unions at a government intelligence establishment?
What did the Supreme Court decide in 2019 about the prorogation of Parliament?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What was decided in the 1985 case concerning trade unions at a government intelligence establishment?
Model answer
The court held that the exercise of prerogative power was reviewable in principle, though on these facts national security justified the minister's decision.
- 2
What did the Supreme Court decide in 2017 about beginning the process of leaving the European Union?
Model answer
It held that ministers could not use prerogative power to start the process because doing so would remove rights created by statute, so an Act of Parliament was required.
- 3
What did the Supreme Court decide in 2019 about the prorogation of Parliament?
Model answer
It held that advising a prorogation which frustrated Parliament's ability to carry out its functions without reasonable justification was unlawful, and the prorogation was of no effect.
- 4
Why was the 2019 prorogation case constitutionally significant?
Model answer
It established that a prerogative power exercised by the government could be measured against constitutional principles, rather than being treated as purely political.
- 5
What did the Supreme Court decide in 2015 about a minister overriding a decision to disclose correspondence?
Model answer
It quashed the minister's certificate, holding that a member of the executive could not simply set aside a court's reasoned decision that information should be released.
- 6
What did the Supreme Court decide in 2017 about fees for employment tribunal claims?
Model answer
It held the fees unlawful because they prevented people of limited means from bringing claims, and so denied access to justice.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in The Protection of Human Rights, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.