WJEC A-Level Government and Politics 603-1979-3
The British Constitution
The Judiciary and the Supreme Court
The UK Executive
Parliament and the Accountability of Government
Government and the Senedd in Wales
Devolution and the United Kingdom
Citizenship and Rights
The Protection of Human Rights
Democracy and Participation
Electoral Systems in the UK
Voting Behaviour in the UK
Political Parties in Wales and the UK
Pressure Groups and Social Movements
Liberalism
Conservatism
Socialism and Communism
Nationalism
The US Constitution and Federalism
Rights and Liberties in the USA
The US Congress
The US Presidency
The US Supreme Court
US Elections and Voting Behaviour
Political Parties in the USA
The US Supreme Court
The Court and the protection of rights
- 3 things to know
- A2 Unit 4
Overview
Recall questions on why an unpopular minority turns to the Court, the rulings that expanded rights and those that failed them, a right later withdrawn, and what Congress can do instead.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Give two rulings that expanded rights.
Give two rulings criticised for failing to protect rights.
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
How does the Supreme Court protect rights?
Model answer
By striking down federal and state action that violates constitutional guarantees, and by interpreting those guarantees to cover new circumstances.
- 2
Why is the Court often the only realistic forum for an unpopular minority?
Model answer
Legislatures answer to majorities, so a group with few votes may have no legislative route to a remedy.
- 3
Give two rulings that expanded rights.
Model answer
Brown v Board of Education (1954) on school segregation, and Gideon v Wainwright (1963) on the right to counsel.
- 4
Give two rulings criticised for failing to protect rights.
Model answer
Plessy v Ferguson (1896), which upheld segregation, and Korematsu v United States (1944), which upheld wartime internment on grounds of ancestry.
- 5
What does the record of such cases suggest about the Court as a rights guarantor?
Model answer
That it has sometimes led public opinion and sometimes followed it, so it is a real but unreliable protector.
- 6
Why is the Court's inability to enforce its own rulings significant for rights?
Model answer
A judgment depends on executive officials to give it effect, so resistance can leave a right nominal for years.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in The US Supreme Court, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.