WJEC A-Level Government and Politics 603-1979-3
The British Constitution
The Judiciary and the Supreme Court
The UK Executive
Parliament and the Accountability of Government
Government and the Senedd in Wales
Devolution and the United Kingdom
Citizenship and Rights
The Protection of Human Rights
Democracy and Participation
Electoral Systems in the UK
Voting Behaviour in the UK
Political Parties in Wales and the UK
Pressure Groups and Social Movements
Liberalism
Conservatism
Socialism and Communism
Nationalism
The US Constitution and Federalism
Rights and Liberties in the USA
The US Congress
The US Presidency
The US Supreme Court
US Elections and Voting Behaviour
Political Parties in the USA
Pressure Groups and Social Movements
Pressure groups and the health of democracy
- 3 things to know
- AS Unit 2
Overview
Tyranny of the minority in this debate, criticism that pressure groups lack internal democracy and argument that pressure groups improve the quality of legislation.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
How does the pluralist case rest on pressure groups?
How do elitists interpret pressure group activity?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
Give three arguments that pressure groups strengthen democracy.
Model answer
They give citizens a voice between elections, they bring expertise into policy-making, and they hold government to account on issues parties neglect.
- 2
Give three arguments that pressure groups weaken democracy.
Model answer
Influence follows money rather than numbers, group leaders are elected by nobody, and a determined minority can block what a majority supports.
- 3
How does the pluralist case rest on pressure groups?
Model answer
Pluralists argue that many competing groups with different resources check one another, so no single interest can dominate government.
- 4
How do elitists interpret the same activity?
Model answer
Elitists argue that only well-funded and well-connected groups are genuinely heard, so group politics reinforces the advantages of those who already hold power.
- 5
What is meant by the tyranny of the minority in this debate?
Model answer
It is the danger that a well-organised group secures an outcome that suits it at the expense of a majority who are too dispersed to organise against it.
- 6
Explain the criticism that pressure groups lack internal democracy.
Model answer
Members often have little say over strategy or leadership, so a group claiming to speak for thousands may express only the views of a small staff.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Pressure Groups and Social Movements, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.