levo

The Self

Vohs and Schooler's cheating study and Van Houtte and Jarvis's pet study

  • 3 things to know
  • Paper 2

Overview

Vohs and Schooler's experiments on reading about determinism and cheating, and Van Houtte and Jarvis's study of pet ownership and children's self-esteem.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Process

What was the procedure of Van Houtte and Jarvis (1995)?

Key term

What was the aim of Vohs and Schooler (2008)?

Key term

What did participants read in the first experiment of Vohs and Schooler (2008)?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What was the aim of Vohs and Schooler (2008)?

    Model answer

    Vohs and Schooler aimed to find out whether weakening people's belief in free will would make them more likely to cheat.

  2. 2

    What did participants read in the first experiment of Vohs and Schooler (2008)?

    Model answer

    Thirty students were split between two conditions. One group read a passage from a book by Francis Crick arguing that free will is an illusion; the control group read a passage from the same book that did not discuss free will.

  3. 3

    How was cheating measured in the first experiment of Vohs and Schooler (2008)?

    Model answer

    Participants solved 20 mental arithmetic problems on a computer and were told a glitch would reveal each answer. Participants were asked to press the space bar to hide it, so not pressing it counted as cheating.

  4. 4

    What did the first experiment of Vohs and Schooler (2008) find?

    Model answer

    Participants who read the passage against free will cheated more than the control group. Weaker belief in free will, measured by a questionnaire, went with more cheating.

  5. 5

    What happened in the second experiment of Vohs and Schooler (2008)?

    Model answer

    Students read statements supporting free will, supporting determinism or neither. Participants then scored their own answers to reasoning problems and paid themselves $1 for each one they claimed was correct.

  6. 6

    What did the second experiment of Vohs and Schooler (2008) find?

    Model answer

    Participants who read determinism statements paid themselves more money than the other groups. The determinism group had not actually solved more problems, so the extra money showed cheating.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Development
Memory
Psychological Problems
The Brain and Neuropsychology

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

Long-term memory can last for a .
lifetimeminutesecond

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AThe median is 10.
BIn order the scores are 4, 7, 9, 11, 15 and 18.
CThe middle two scores give (9 + 11) ÷ 2 = 10.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Short-term memory can hold about 7 ± 2 items at once.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in The Self, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.