Edexcel A-Level Politics 9PL0
Democracy and Participation
Political Parties
Electoral Systems
Voting Behaviour and the Media
Liberalism
Conservatism
Socialism
The Constitution
Parliament
The Prime Minister and the Executive
Relations Between the Branches
AnarchismNon-core
EcologismNon-core
FeminismNon-core
MulticulturalismNon-core
NationalismNon-core
The US Constitution and FederalismUSA
US CongressUSA
The US PresidencyUSA
The US Supreme Court and Civil RightsUSA
US Democracy and ParticipationUSA
Comparative Theories and the UK-US ComparisonUSA
The State and GlobalisationGlobal
Global Governance: Political and EconomicGlobal
Global Governance: Human Rights and EnvironmentalGlobal
Power and DevelopmentsGlobal
Regionalism and the European UnionGlobal
Global Comparative TheoriesGlobal
Global Comparative Theories
Divisions between realism and liberalism
- 3 things to know
- Component 3
Overview
Recall questions on where the two theories part company over human nature, power, order, conflict, institutions and sovereignty.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
How do the two theories differ on the nature of power?
How do realists and liberals differ on the causes of order in the international system?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
How do realists and liberals differ on human nature?
Model answer
Realists treat self-interest and the drive for security as fixed features that no institution can reform. Liberals treat people as capable of reason and moral development, so behaviour can improve as institutions improve.
- 2
How do the two theories differ on the nature of power?
Model answer
Realists treat power as principally military and economic, and as relative — what matters is your position against rivals. Liberals treat power as also normative and institutional, and as capable of growing for everyone at once.
- 3
How do the two theories differ on the significance of the state?
Model answer
Realists hold that states remain the only actors that finally matter, since sovereignty and force rest with them. Liberals hold that states now share the stage with institutions, corporations, NGOs and individuals.
- 4
How do the two theories explain the security dilemma differently?
Model answer
Realists treat it as a permanent consequence of anarchy that only a balance of power can manage. Liberals argue institutions can defuse it by making military capabilities transparent and building trust over repeated dealings.
- 5
Which theory better explains the European Union, and why?
Model answer
Liberalism: sovereign states with a long history of warfare have pooled authority permanently in binding institutions. Realists reply that this happened under a US security guarantee and that member states have still resisted transferring defence and foreign policy.
- 6
Why do the two theories reach opposite conclusions about the same evidence?
Model answer
Because they start from different assumptions about what drives states. Realists read cooperation as a temporary alignment of interests; liberals read conflict as a failure of institutions that have not yet developed.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Global Comparative Theories, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.