Edexcel A-Level Politics 9PL0
Democracy and Participation
Political Parties
Electoral Systems
Voting Behaviour and the Media
Liberalism
Conservatism
Socialism
The Constitution
Parliament
The Prime Minister and the Executive
Relations Between the Branches
AnarchismNon-core
EcologismNon-core
FeminismNon-core
MulticulturalismNon-core
NationalismNon-core
The US Constitution and FederalismUSA
US CongressUSA
The US PresidencyUSA
The US Supreme Court and Civil RightsUSA
US Democracy and ParticipationUSA
Comparative Theories and the UK-US ComparisonUSA
The State and GlobalisationGlobal
Global Governance: Political and EconomicGlobal
Global Governance: Human Rights and EnvironmentalGlobal
Power and DevelopmentsGlobal
Regionalism and the European UnionGlobal
Global Comparative TheoriesGlobal
The US Supreme Court and Civil Rights
Judicial activism, restraint and public policy
- 3 things to know
- Component 3
Overview
Judicial activism and restraint and the criticisms of each, why activism is not a liberal trait, and the Court's impact on public policy in Heller, Obergefell, Dobbs, West Virginia v EPA, Loper Bright, Trump v United States and the 2026 tariffs ruling.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What was the significance of Loper Bright Enterprises v Raimondo (2024) for public policy?
What was the impact of Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022) on public policy?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What is judicial activism?
Model answer
An approach in which justices readily use judicial review to strike down laws or overturn precedent, reading the Constitution broadly so that the Court's rulings shape public policy.
- 2
What is judicial restraint?
Model answer
An approach in which justices defer to the elected branches and to precedent, striking down laws only when they clearly breach the Constitution and leaving policy choices to Congress and the states.
- 3
What criticisms are made of judicial activism?
Model answer
Unelected justices with life tenure end up making policy that should belong to elected representatives — an 'imperial judiciary' — and bold rulings can inflame political conflict for decades, as Roe v Wade (1973) did.
- 4
What criticisms are made of judicial restraint?
Model answer
Deferring to elected majorities can leave minority rights unprotected: the Court upheld segregation in Plessy v Ferguson (1896) and the internment of Japanese Americans in Korematsu v United States (1944).
- 5
Why is it misleading to equate judicial activism with liberal justices?
Model answer
Activism describes a willingness to overturn laws or precedent, not a political direction: the liberal Warren Court of the 1950s and 1960s was activist, but so was the conservative majority that overturned Roe v Wade in 2022.
- 6
What was the impact of District of Columbia v Heller (2008) on public policy?
Model answer
The Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to keep a handgun at home for self-defence, striking down Washington DC's handgun ban and limiting how far governments can regulate guns.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in The US Supreme Court and Civil Rights, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.