Edexcel A-Level Politics 9PL0
Democracy and Participation
Political Parties
Electoral Systems
Voting Behaviour and the Media
Liberalism
Conservatism
Socialism
The Constitution
Parliament
The Prime Minister and the Executive
Relations Between the Branches
AnarchismNon-core
EcologismNon-core
FeminismNon-core
MulticulturalismNon-core
NationalismNon-core
The US Constitution and FederalismUSA
US CongressUSA
The US PresidencyUSA
The US Supreme Court and Civil RightsUSA
US Democracy and ParticipationUSA
Comparative Theories and the UK-US ComparisonUSA
The State and GlobalisationGlobal
Global Governance: Political and EconomicGlobal
Global Governance: Human Rights and EnvironmentalGlobal
Power and DevelopmentsGlobal
Regionalism and the European UnionGlobal
Global Comparative TheoriesGlobal
The US Supreme Court and Civil Rights
Judicial review, appointments and the current Court
- 3 things to know
- Component 3
Overview
Fletcher v Peck and the extension of judicial review, the strengths and weaknesses of the appointment process, Bork and Miers, partisan confirmations and the end of the filibuster, what shapes a president's choice of nominee, the Court's membership and balance in 2026, and the swing justice.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What is a swing justice?
Why is Fletcher v Peck significant for judicial review?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What did the Supreme Court decide in Fletcher v Peck (1810)?
Model answer
That Georgia's law cancelling the Yazoo land sales was unconstitutional because it broke contracts protected by the Contract Clause — the first time the Court struck down a state law.
- 2
Why is Fletcher v Peck significant for judicial review?
Model answer
Marbury v Madison (1803) had established the Court's power to strike down an Act of Congress; Fletcher v Peck extended judicial review to state legislation, making the Court the arbiter of the boundary between state and federal power.
- 3
What strengths are claimed for the Supreme Court appointment process?
Model answer
Nomination by an elected President and confirmation by an elected Senate give justices democratic legitimacy, while Senate hearings allow a nominee's record and qualifications to be scrutinised before life tenure is granted.
- 4
Give examples of the Senate's role stopping an unsuitable or controversial nominee.
Model answer
The Senate rejected Robert Bork by 58 votes to 42 in 1987 over his views on civil rights, and in 2005 Harriet Miers withdrew amid criticism of her lack of judicial experience.
- 5
Why are Supreme Court confirmation hearings criticised as ineffective?
Model answer
Nominees routinely decline to say how they would rule on issues likely to come before the Court, so senators learn little about their views, and votes increasingly split along party lines.
- 6
How did events in 2016 and 2020 show partisan control of the Senate shaping appointments?
Model answer
In 2016 the Republican Senate refused to hold hearings on Barack Obama's nominee Merrick Garland, but in 2020 it confirmed Amy Coney Barrett eight days before the presidential election.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in The US Supreme Court and Civil Rights, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.