Edexcel A-Level Politics 9PL0
Democracy and Participation
Political Parties
Electoral Systems
Voting Behaviour and the Media
Liberalism
Conservatism
Socialism
The Constitution
Parliament
The Prime Minister and the Executive
Relations Between the Branches
AnarchismNon-core
EcologismNon-core
FeminismNon-core
MulticulturalismNon-core
NationalismNon-core
The US Constitution and FederalismUSA
US CongressUSA
The US PresidencyUSA
The US Supreme Court and Civil RightsUSA
US Democracy and ParticipationUSA
Comparative Theories and the UK-US ComparisonUSA
The State and GlobalisationGlobal
Global Governance: Political and EconomicGlobal
Global Governance: Human Rights and EnvironmentalGlobal
Power and DevelopmentsGlobal
Regionalism and the European UnionGlobal
Global Comparative TheoriesGlobal
Liberalism
Rawls, Friedan and modern liberalism
- 1 thing to know
- Component 1
Overview
Recall questions on the enabling state, Rawls on justice and the veil of ignorance, and Friedan on legal equality and the barriers that held women back from their potential.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What is an enabling state?
Model answer
An enabling state is one that intervenes to create the conditions necessary for individuals to achieve self-realisation and fulfil their potential.
- 2
What is the central claim of John Rawls' theory of justice?
Model answer
That the arrangement of a society is only defensible if it leaves even its worst-off members with lives they can regard as worth living.
- 3
What is Rawls' veil of ignorance?
Model answer
A thought experiment in which people choose the rules of their society before learning anything about who they will be within it — their class, talents, sex or beliefs.
- 4
What was Betty Friedan's argument regarding legal equality?
Model answer
That nothing in women's capacities justified their exclusion, so the laws and attitudes that produced it had to go.
- 5
Why did Friedan argue that women were held back from their potential?
Model answer
Because so narrow a range of occupations was thought suitable for them that most were left with no outlet for their abilities.
- 6
How does the veil of ignorance ensure impartiality in choosing principles of justice?
Model answer
By removing knowledge of personal circumstances, so individuals cannot design principles that favour their own position.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Liberalism, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.