levo

Business Objectives and Strategy

Conflicting results from decision-making tools

  • 1 thing to know
  • Components 01, 02 and 03

Overview

Recall questions on why two decision-making tools can point opposite ways, quantitative against qualitative information, and how a business should resolve the disagreement.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

Why can two decision-making tools point to different conclusions?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    Why can two decision-making tools point to different conclusions?

    Model answer

    Each tool measures something different, so one may weigh expected financial return while another weighs risk or strategic fit, and they therefore rank the options on different criteria.

  2. 2

    Give an example of a numerical tool and a strategic model disagreeing about the same option.

    Model answer

    A decision tree may show the highest net gain for a move into a new product and a new market that Ansoff's matrix identifies as the riskiest option available.

  3. 3

    Why should a business not simply adopt whichever tool gives the most favourable answer?

    Model answer

    Choosing the tool after seeing its result is confirmation bias, and it turns analysis into justification for a decision that has already been made.

  4. 4

    What is the difference between quantitative and qualitative information in a decision?

    Model answer

    Quantitative information is measurable data such as costs and forecast returns, while qualitative information covers factors that cannot be counted, such as staff morale, reputation and ethics.

  5. 5

    Why can a decision based only on quantitative information still be wrong?

    Model answer

    The numbers rest on forecasts and estimates and they exclude everything that cannot be measured, so an option can look best on paper and be unacceptable in practice.

  6. 6

    Why can a decision based only on qualitative judgement be dangerous?

    Model answer

    Without figures there is no test of whether the business can afford the option or whether the return justifies the cost, and personal bias goes unchallenged.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Introduction to Business
Business Objectives and Strategy
External Influences
Accounting and Finance

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

Revenue the cost of sales.
minusplustimes

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AHow much finance the business needs to raise.
BHow much personal risk the owner is willing to carry.
CHow much control they want to keep.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Customer means the person who buys a product and pays for it.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Business Objectives and Strategy, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.