levo

Civil Rights Compared

Security, Guns and Reforming the Rights Framework

  • 4 things to know
  • Paper 2

Overview

Recall questions on how far rights vary internally, restrictions imposed for security, why guns are a constitutional question, and the reform debates.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

How far can rights vary within each country?

Key term

Compare the debates about reforming the rights framework itself.

Key term

How is equality law enforced in each country?

Process

How have both countries curtailed liberties for security, and what limits American gun legislation?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    How far can rights vary within each country?

    Model answer

    Rights can vary substantially between US states within the limits the constitution sets, while UK human rights legislation applies uniformly and the devolved bodies must comply with it.

  2. 2

    How has each country restricted liberties in the name of security?

    Model answer

    Both have curtailed liberties in response to terrorism, through measures such as the Patriot Act in the USA and successive counter-terrorism and surveillance statutes in the UK.

  3. 3

    Why is gun ownership a constitutional question in the USA but not in the UK?

    Model answer

    The Second Amendment limits what American legislatures may do, while UK firearms control is settled by ordinary statute and is not a serious point of party division.

  4. 4

    Compare the debates about reforming the rights framework itself.

    Model answer

    UK debate has centred on replacing the Human Rights Act with a British Bill of Rights and on membership of the European Convention, while US debate concerns how the constitution should be interpreted rather than whether to replace it.

  5. 5

    Compare affirmative action in the USA with positive action in the UK.

    Model answer

    US affirmative action programmes have repeatedly been fought out in the courts, while UK law permits only limited positive action and generally prohibits quotas.

  6. 6

    What part do pressure groups play in protecting rights in each country?

    Model answer

    Groups in both countries bring test cases, lobby and campaign publicly, but US groups can secure constitutional change through the courts in a way UK groups cannot.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

The Nature and Sources of the British Constitution
The Structure and Role of Parliament
The Prime Minister and Cabinet
The UK Judiciary

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The Code.
MinisterialCabinetParliamentary

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AA US court can strike down a hostile law using the constitution.
BA UK court cannot.
CChange must come from persuading legislators.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Veto means formal rejection of legislation.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Civil Rights Compared, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.