AQA A-Level Politics 7152
The Nature and Sources of the British Constitution
The Structure and Role of Parliament
The Prime Minister and Cabinet
The UK Judiciary
Devolution
Democracy and Participation
Elections and Referendums
Political Parties in the UK
Pressure Groups in the UK
The UK and the European Union
The Constitutional Framework of US Government
Congress
The US Presidency
The US Supreme Court
US Elections and Direct Democracy
Political Parties in the USA
Pressure Groups in the USA
Civil Rights in the USA
Comparative Politics: Theoretical Approaches
Constitutions and Legislatures Compared
The Executives Compared
The Judiciaries Compared
Electoral and Party Systems Compared
Pressure Groups Compared
Civil Rights Compared
Liberalism
Conservatism
Socialism
NationalismIdeology
FeminismIdeology
MulticulturalismIdeology
AnarchismIdeology
Civil Rights in the USA
Landmark Rights Rulings and the Supreme Court
- 2 things to know
- Paper 2
Overview
Recall questions on landmark Supreme Court rulings on rights, from Brown and Miranda to Heller, Obergefell and the Court's changing position on abortion, and on whether the Court is a reliable protector of rights.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Why should landmark rulings be treated as illustrative rather than as a closed list?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What did the Supreme Court decide in Brown v Board of Education of Topeka?
Model answer
It held in 1954 that segregated public schooling was inherently unequal and therefore breached the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of equal protection.
- 2
Why did Brown v Board of Education not immediately end segregated schooling?
Model answer
The Court required desegregation only 'with all deliberate speed', gave no timetable, and met massive resistance in the southern states, so federal enforcement and further litigation were needed over many years.
- 3
What did Miranda v Arizona establish?
Model answer
It held in 1966 that suspects must be told of their rights to silence and to a lawyer before questioning, or their statements cannot be used against them.
- 4
What did Texas v Johnson decide?
Model answer
It held in 1989 that burning the national flag as a political protest is symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment.
- 5
What did District of Columbia v Heller establish about the Second Amendment?
Model answer
It held in 2008 that the amendment protects an individual right to possess a handgun in the home for self-defence, independently of service in a militia.
- 6
How did the Supreme Court extend Heller two years later?
Model answer
In McDonald v Chicago in 2010 it incorporated the Second Amendment against the states, so state and city gun laws are subject to it too.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Civil Rights in the USA, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.