levo

Civil Rights in the USA

Landmark Rights Rulings and the Supreme Court

  • 2 things to know
  • Paper 2

Overview

Recall questions on landmark Supreme Court rulings on rights, from Brown and Miranda to Heller, Obergefell and the Court's changing position on abortion, and on whether the Court is a reliable protector of rights.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

Why did Brown v Board of Education not immediately end segregated schooling?

Key term

Why should landmark rulings be treated as illustrative rather than as a closed list?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What did the Supreme Court decide in Brown v Board of Education of Topeka?

    Model answer

    It held in 1954 that segregated public schooling was inherently unequal and therefore breached the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of equal protection.

  2. 2

    Why did Brown v Board of Education not immediately end segregated schooling?

    Model answer

    The Court required desegregation only 'with all deliberate speed', gave no timetable, and met massive resistance in the southern states, so federal enforcement and further litigation were needed over many years.

  3. 3

    What did Miranda v Arizona establish?

    Model answer

    It held in 1966 that suspects must be told of their rights to silence and to a lawyer before questioning, or their statements cannot be used against them.

  4. 4

    What did Texas v Johnson decide?

    Model answer

    It held in 1989 that burning the national flag as a political protest is symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment.

  5. 5

    What did District of Columbia v Heller establish about the Second Amendment?

    Model answer

    It held in 2008 that the amendment protects an individual right to possess a handgun in the home for self-defence, independently of service in a militia.

  6. 6

    How did the Supreme Court extend Heller two years later?

    Model answer

    In McDonald v Chicago in 2010 it incorporated the Second Amendment against the states, so state and city gun laws are subject to it too.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

The Nature and Sources of the British Constitution
The Structure and Role of Parliament
The Prime Minister and Cabinet
The UK Judiciary

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The Code.
MinisterialCabinetParliamentary

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AA US court can strike down a hostile law using the constitution.
BA UK court cannot.
CChange must come from persuading legislators.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Veto means formal rejection of legislation.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Civil Rights in the USA, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.