AQA A-Level Politics 7152
The Nature and Sources of the British Constitution
The Structure and Role of Parliament
The Prime Minister and Cabinet
The UK Judiciary
Devolution
Democracy and Participation
Elections and Referendums
Political Parties in the UK
Pressure Groups in the UK
The UK and the European Union
The Constitutional Framework of US Government
Congress
The US Presidency
The US Supreme Court
US Elections and Direct Democracy
Political Parties in the USA
Pressure Groups in the USA
Civil Rights in the USA
Comparative Politics: Theoretical Approaches
Constitutions and Legislatures Compared
The Executives Compared
The Judiciaries Compared
Electoral and Party Systems Compared
Pressure Groups Compared
Civil Rights Compared
Liberalism
Conservatism
Socialism
NationalismIdeology
FeminismIdeology
MulticulturalismIdeology
AnarchismIdeology
The UK Judiciary
Judicial Review and the Miller Cases
- 3 things to know
- Paper 1
Overview
Recall questions on what the courts can and cannot do to Acts and to ministerial decisions, and on the rulings of 2017 and 2019.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What did the Belmarsh ruling of 2004 decide?
How does the possibility of legal challenge shape government behaviour before any case is brought?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
Can the Supreme Court strike down an Act of Parliament?
Model answer
No — parliamentary sovereignty means it can only interpret a statute or declare it incompatible with Convention rights.
- 2
What can the courts do to ministerial decisions and secondary legislation?
Model answer
They can quash them as ultra vires where they exceed the powers granted by the parent Act.
- 3
In 2017 the Supreme Court ruled the government could not begin withdrawal from the EU using prerogative powers alone. What did it require instead?
Model answer
An Act of Parliament authorising notification of the UK's intention to withdraw.
- 4
What did the Supreme Court decide about prorogation in 2019?
Model answer
That the prorogation of Parliament was unlawful and of no effect because it frustrated Parliament's constitutional functions without reasonable justification.
- 5
What did the Belmarsh ruling of 2004 decide?
Model answer
That the indefinite detention without trial of foreign terrorist suspects was incompatible with Convention rights because it was disproportionate and discriminatory.
- 6
How did Parliament respond to the Belmarsh ruling of 2004?
Model answer
It repealed the detention power and replaced it with control orders, showing that a declaration of incompatibility prompts a change in the law without compelling one.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in The UK Judiciary, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.