levo

Contemporary Debates

Debate: Reliability of Eye-Witness Testimony (Including Children) — what is at the core of the debate

  • 3 things to know
  • AS Unit 2

Overview

Recall questions on reconstructive memory and weapon focus.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Study

What did the second Loftus and Palmer experiment add, and why is it the more damaging finding?

Who and when

What did Bartlett's War of the Ghosts study show?

Who and when

What speed estimates did the two extreme verbs produce?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What is at the core of the debate about eye-witness testimony?

    Model answer

    Whether memory is dependable enough for a court to convict on, given that psychology treats remembering as an active reconstruction while the legal system has traditionally treated a witness as a recording of what happened.

  2. 2

    What is reconstructive memory?

    Model answer

    It is Bartlett's idea that recall rebuilds an event from fragments plus expectation, so what is remembered is shaped by the schemas the person already holds.

  3. 3

    What did Bartlett's War of the Ghosts study show?

    Model answer

    English participants retelling an unfamiliar folk tale shortened it, dropped details they could not make sense of and altered it to fit their own cultural expectations.

  4. 4

    Describe the procedure of the first Loftus & Palmer (1974) experiment.

    Model answer

    Forty-five students watched films of car accidents and estimated the speed of the vehicles, with the verb in the critical question varied between smashed, collided, bumped, hit and contacted.

  5. 5

    What speed estimates did the two extreme verbs produce?

    Model answer

    A mean of about 40.8 mph in the smashed condition and about 31.8 mph in the contacted condition.

  6. 6

    What did the second Loftus & Palmer experiment add?

    Model answer

    A week later participants were asked whether they had seen broken glass; there had been none, yet 16 of the 50 in the smashed condition said they had, against 7 in the hit condition and 6 in the control condition.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Psychology Past to Present — The Five Approaches
Contemporary Debates
Principles of Research and Application of Research Methods
Mathematical Requirements for Psychology (Appendix A: AS Unit 2 and A2 Unit 4)

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

Memory is .
reconstructivereproductivepermanent

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AParticipants volunteer and are already motivated.
BSamples are self-selecting.
CNo convincing placebo version exists.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

An MRI scan images structure only.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Contemporary Debates, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.