levo

Crown and Parliament in England 1625–1714

The breakdown under Charles I 1625–40

  • 3 things to know
  • A2 Unit 1

Overview

The parliaments of 1625 to 1629 and the Petition of Right, the eleven years without Parliament, and what Ship Money and Hampden's Case revealed.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

How did the parliaments of 1625 to 1629 change the Crown's position?

Key term

What did the Petition of Right of 1628 assert about the Crown's powers?

Key term

What did the narrow judgment in Hampden's Case reveal?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    How did the parliaments of 1625 to 1629 change the Crown's position?

    Model answer

    Four short and hostile sessions produced limited supply, though the 1628 Parliament granted five subsidies, an impeachment of the King's favourite and a statement of grievances, so Charles emerged convinced Parliaments were unmanageable.

  2. 2

    What did the Petition of Right of 1628 assert about the Crown's powers?

    Model answer

    It denied that the King could tax without parliamentary consent, imprison without showing cause, billet soldiers on civilians or use martial law in peacetime.

  3. 3

    Why did the Petition of Right settle nothing?

    Model answer

    Charles accepted it to obtain supply but insisted that it declared existing law and left his prerogative untouched, so both sides read it differently.

  4. 4

    What did the eleven years after 1629 demonstrate about the Crown's independence?

    Model answer

    They showed that a king at peace could fund himself from prerogative revenue and govern indefinitely without Parliament, which made Parliament look dispensable.

  5. 5

    What did the same eleven years demonstrate about the Crown's limits?

    Model answer

    They showed that prerogative revenue could support peacetime administration but could not fund a war, so a single Scottish campaign destroyed the whole system.

  6. 6

    Why was Ship Money a constitutional rather than merely a fiscal question?

    Model answer

    If the King alone could judge when an emergency justified a levy, and could take it annually inland in peacetime, then there was no limit to taxation without consent.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

England 1509–58
England 1603–49
Britain in the Age of Reform 1830–80
Italy and Germany 1815–71

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

Henry cited .
LeviticusGenesisExodus

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AImpeachment failed for want of proof.
BThe Commons passed an Act of Attainder.
CCharles signed his execution warrant in May 1641.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Rent reduction made the tenancy bearable.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Crown and Parliament in England 1625–1714, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.