Eduqas A-Level Psychology A290QS
Biological Approach
Psychodynamic Approach
Behaviourist Approach
Cognitive Approach
Positive Approach
Comparing the Five Approaches
Core Studies in Social and Developmental Psychology
Planning Psychological Research
Data Handling, Statistics and Mathematical Skills
Evaluating and Validating Research
Personal Investigations and Novel Research Scenarios
Addictive BehavioursAddictive
Autistic Spectrum BehavioursAutistic spectrum
Bullying BehavioursBullying
Criminal BehavioursCriminal
SchizophreniaSchizophrenia
StressStress
Controversies in Psychology
Behaviourist Approach
Classic research: Ethical issues and social implications
- 3 things to know
- Component 1
Overview
Recall questions on Ethical issues and social implications.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Which ethical issues does the study raise?
Why is the question of consent in this study still disputed?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
Which ethical issues does the study raise?
Model answer
Albert was deliberately caused distress with no protection from harm, the fear was never removed afterwards, and as an infant he could neither give consent nor withdraw.
- 2
Why is the question of consent in this study still disputed?
Model answer
Accounts differ over how fully Albert's mother was informed, and as an employee of the institution she was in a weak position to refuse.
- 3
Give two social implications of the study.
Model answer
It supported the view that a child's emotional life is shaped by their environment and so influenced the advice given to parents, and it opened the way to behavioural treatments for phobias.
- 4
Which later work applied the study's logic to removing a child's fear?
Model answer
Mary Cover Jones's 1924 work with a boy called Peter, in which a feared rabbit was brought gradually closer while he ate, which is a forerunner of systematic desensitisation.
- 5
Give two methodological criticisms of the study.
Model answer
The fear reactions were judged subjectively by the same researchers who wanted the conditioning to succeed, and the procedure was not fully standardised because extra trials were added whenever the response weakened.
- 6
Why can the findings not be generalised with confidence?
Model answer
They rest on a single infant whose reactions may have been atypical, so there is no way of knowing whether other children would have responded in the same way.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Behaviourist Approach, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.