levo

Positive Approach

Classic research: Ethical issues and social implications

  • 3 things to know
  • Component 1

Overview

Recall questions on Ethical issues and social implications.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Evaluation

What are two strengths to weigh when making judgements on this piece of evidence?

Numbers

Psychologists still disagree about money and happiness. Outline the disagreement.

Key term

Why might the conclusions have poor temporal validity today?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    Discuss the ethical issues raised by the classic study.

    Model answer

    Because it reanalysed data already collected by others, the authors had no direct participants and no individual could be identified, so consent and confidentiality had been handled by the original survey researchers rather than by them.

  2. 2

    Why is the study nevertheless regarded as socially sensitive?

    Model answer

    It publishes comparisons between racial groups, between men and women and between nations, and such findings can be used to stereotype groups or to argue that a disadvantaged group does not mind its disadvantage.

  3. 3

    What is one social implication of the finding that income matters little to happiness?

    Model answer

    It supports governments measuring national well-being alongside economic output when judging policy, since a rising national income need not mean people's lives are going better.

  4. 4

    How could the findings on money be misused?

    Model answer

    They could be quoted to argue that reducing poverty is unnecessary because money does not buy happiness, when the review in fact shows that poverty and unmet basic needs do lower well-being.

  5. 5

    What are two strengths to weigh when making judgements on this piece of evidence?

    Model answer

    The data come from very large and cross-cultural samples, giving high population validity, and the same conclusions emerge from several different methods, including surveys, peer reports and experience sampling, which strengthens their reliability.

  6. 6

    What are two weaknesses to weigh when making judgements on this piece of evidence?

    Model answer

    The relationships are correlational, so it cannot be shown whether extraversion causes happiness or happiness makes people sociable, and the data rest on self-report, which is vulnerable to social desirability and to the respondent's mood at the time.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Biological Approach
Psychodynamic Approach
Behaviourist Approach
Cognitive Approach

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

Watson and Rayner.
RosalieAlbertDouglas

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AThe mean of condition A is 15.
BThe mean of condition B is 10.
CThe difference between them is 5.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

The range uses only the two extreme scores.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Positive Approach, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.