Eduqas A-Level Psychology A290QS
Biological Approach
Psychodynamic Approach
Behaviourist Approach
Cognitive Approach
Positive Approach
Comparing the Five Approaches
Core Studies in Social and Developmental Psychology
Planning Psychological Research
Data Handling, Statistics and Mathematical Skills
Evaluating and Validating Research
Personal Investigations and Novel Research Scenarios
Addictive BehavioursAddictive
Autistic Spectrum BehavioursAutistic spectrum
Bullying BehavioursBullying
Criminal BehavioursCriminal
SchizophreniaSchizophrenia
StressStress
Controversies in Psychology
Core Studies in Social and Developmental Psychology
Social psychology core study: Milgram (1963) — Conclusions and Evaluation of the study
- 3 things to know
- Component 2
Overview
Recall questions on Milgram — Conclusions and Evaluation of the study.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Why is the right to withdraw said to have been compromised?
What did Milgram conclude about obedience?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What did Milgram conclude about obedience?
Model answer
Ordinary people will obey an authority figure they regard as legitimate even when ordered to harm an innocent person, so obedience owes more to the situation than to the individual's personality.
- 2
Give one methodological strength of the study.
Model answer
The procedure was highly standardised, with the same confederate, script, prods and apparatus for everyone, so it is reliable and has been replicated many times.
- 3
On what grounds did Orne and Holland (1968) criticise Milgram?
Model answer
They argued that participants did not really believe the shocks were harmful and were simply going along with what they thought the experimenter wanted, so the study measured demand characteristics rather than obedience.
- 4
What alternative to “blind obedience” has been offered as an explanation of the results?
Model answer
Haslam and Reicher have argued for engaged followership, in which participants actively identified with the scientific goal and cooperated willingly; Milgram's own account emphasised surrender to authority, and the two readings remain in dispute.
- 5
Why is the task criticised as artificial, and what evidence answers that criticism?
Model answer
Shocking a stranger in a laboratory is nothing like everyday obedience; however, Hofling et al. (1966) found that nurses obeyed an unsafe drug instruction from an unknown doctor in a real hospital, although Rank and Jacobson (1977) found obedience fell sharply when the drug was familiar and nurses could consult a colleague.
- 6
What limits the generalisability of the sample, and what evidence weakens that criticism?
Model answer
All forty participants were American men, so the findings are androcentric and culture-bound; Burger's 2009 partial replication nevertheless found comparably high obedience in both men and women.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Core Studies in Social and Developmental Psychology, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.