levo

Bullying Behaviours

Methods of modifying the behaviour

  • 3 things to know
  • Component 3 Applications

Overview

Recall questions on Methods of modifying the behaviour.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Who and when

What did Olweus report from the first Bergen evaluation, and what is the caveat?

Key term

Why can a successful programme appear to increase bullying in its first year?

Key term

Give one ethical problem with evaluating whole-school programmes by randomised trial.

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    How do biological explanations bear on what these programmes can realistically achieve?

    Model answer

    If temperament is partly heritable, a programme cannot remove the disposition, only change the environment that rewards its expression, which is what altering supervision and norms does.

  2. 2

    What did Olweus report from the first Bergen evaluation, and what is the caveat?

    Model answer

    Reductions of around a half in reported bullying after eight and twenty months, though the age-cohort design had no separate control group and later replications produced smaller effects.

  3. 3

    What did Ttofi and Farrington's (2011) meta-analysis conclude?

    Model answer

    Across 44 evaluations, anti-bullying programmes cut bullying by roughly a fifth and victimisation by a slightly smaller amount, with the more intensive multi-component programmes doing best.

  4. 4

    Which component did that meta-analysis associate with worse outcomes, and why does that matter?

    Model answer

    Work with peers, such as peer mediation, was associated with increased victimisation, showing that a plausible-sounding component can do harm and must be tested rather than assumed.

  5. 5

    Why can a successful programme appear to increase bullying in its first year?

    Model answer

    Awareness-raising teaches pupils to recognise and report behaviour they previously accepted, so reported rates can rise while the actual behaviour is falling.

  6. 6

    Give one ethical problem with evaluating whole-school programmes by randomised trial.

    Model answer

    Pupils and parents cannot realistically opt out of a programme running across their school, and children in control schools are knowingly left without an intervention thought likely to help them.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Biological Approach
Psychodynamic Approach
Behaviourist Approach
Cognitive Approach

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

Watson and Rayner.
RosalieAlbertDouglas

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AThe mean of condition A is 15.
BThe mean of condition B is 10.
CThe difference between them is 5.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

The range uses only the two extreme scores.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Bullying Behaviours, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.