Eduqas A-Level Psychology A290QS
Biological Approach
Psychodynamic Approach
Behaviourist Approach
Cognitive Approach
Positive Approach
Comparing the Five Approaches
Core Studies in Social and Developmental Psychology
Planning Psychological Research
Data Handling, Statistics and Mathematical Skills
Evaluating and Validating Research
Personal Investigations and Novel Research Scenarios
Addictive BehavioursAddictive
Autistic Spectrum BehavioursAutistic spectrum
Bullying BehavioursBullying
Criminal BehavioursCriminal
SchizophreniaSchizophrenia
StressStress
Controversies in Psychology
Core Studies in Social and Developmental Psychology
Developmental psychology core study: Kohlberg (1968) — Conclusions and Evaluation of the study
- 3 things to know
- Component 2
Overview
Recall questions on Kohlberg — Conclusions and Evaluation of the study.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What did Kohlberg conclude from his findings?
What practical implication for moral education follows from the findings?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What did Kohlberg find about how children responded to reasoning at neighbouring stages?
Model answer
Children could understand and preferred arguments one stage above their own, dismissed arguments below their own as simplistic, and could not really grasp reasoning several stages ahead.
- 2
What did Kohlberg conclude from his findings?
Model answer
Moral reasoning develops through a universal, invariant stage sequence driven by cognitive growth and opportunities to take other people's perspectives, so culture affects how fast a person moves and how far they get but not the order of the stages.
- 3
What practical implication for moral education follows from the findings?
Model answer
Children should be exposed to moral arguments one stage above their current reasoning, since that is the level they can grasp and be pulled towards.
- 4
Why is combining cross-sectional and longitudinal methods a strength of this research?
Model answer
The cross-sectional comparison of different ages gives a quick picture of the whole developmental span, while following the same boys over twelve years shows that the order really does hold within an individual and is not just a difference between generations.
- 5
State one drawback of each of the two designs Kohlberg used.
Model answer
A cross-sectional design risks cohort effects, where apparent development is really a difference between generations, and a longitudinal design suffers from participants dropping out over the years and takes a very long time to complete.
- 6
What criticism did Gilligan make of Kohlberg's stages, and how has it been answered?
Model answer
Gilligan (1982) argued that the scale rewards a male-typical justice orientation and undervalues an ethic of care, making women appear stuck at stage three; Walker's (1984) review of the evidence found few consistent sex differences, so the claim remains disputed.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Core Studies in Social and Developmental Psychology, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.