levo

Cognitive Approach

Classic research: Ethical issues and social implications

  • 3 things to know
  • Component 1

Overview

Recall questions on Ethical issues and social implications.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

Why does recruiting participants from the researchers' own students raise an ethical question?

Key term

Why is Loftus and Palmer's research on memory described as socially sensitive?

Numbers

Which real-world study challenges Loftus and Palmer's conclusions?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    Identify the ethical issues raised by the research.

    Model answer

    Participants were deceived about the purpose so their consent was not fully informed, and films of real traffic accidents could distress some people, which makes debriefing and a genuine right to withdraw important.

  2. 2

    Why does recruiting participants from the researchers' own students raise an ethical question?

    Model answer

    Participation may not feel genuinely voluntary when the researcher is connected to the participants' studies, which weakens their right to refuse.

  3. 3

    Give two social implications of the findings.

    Model answer

    They led police forces to avoid leading questions and contributed to the development of the cognitive interview, and they made courts more cautious about convicting on eyewitness evidence alone.

  4. 4

    Give two strengths of the design.

    Model answer

    It was tightly controlled so a causal conclusion could be drawn about the effect of the verb, and the standardised film and questions make it straightforward to replicate.

  5. 5

    State the main criticism of the study's validity.

    Model answer

    Watching a film clip lacks the shock, emotional involvement and consequences of witnessing a real accident, so the research may exaggerate how easily genuine memories are distorted.

  6. 6

    Which real-world study challenges Loftus and Palmer's conclusions?

    Model answer

    Yuille and Cutshall's 1986 study of witnesses to a shooting in Vancouver, who gave accurate accounts months afterwards and were not swayed by deliberately misleading questions.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Biological Approach
Psychodynamic Approach
Behaviourist Approach
Cognitive Approach

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

Watson and Rayner.
RosalieAlbertDouglas

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AThe mean of condition A is 15.
BThe mean of condition B is 10.
CThe difference between them is 5.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

The range uses only the two extreme scores.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Cognitive Approach, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.