WJEC A-Level Law 603-1978-1
Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Dispute Resolution
The Criminal Process and the Criminal Courts
Legal Personnel and the Judiciary
Access to Justice and Funding
Tort: Rules and Theory
Tort: Negligence
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
Tort: Remedies
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Key Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: RestrictionsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection and ReformHuman rights
Contract: Rules and TheoryContract
Contract: FormationContract
Contract: TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and DuressContract
Contract: DischargeContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Contract: Discharge
Exceptions to the entire obligations rule and standards of performance
- 3 things to know
- A2 Units 3 and 4
Overview
Four exceptions to the entire obligations rule, doctrine of substantial performance and effect of one party preventing the other from completing performance.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What is the position where a contract does not fix a time for performance?
State four exceptions to the entire obligations rule.
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
State four exceptions to the entire obligations rule.
Model answer
The rule is displaced where the obligation is divisible, where performance is substantial, where the other party freely accepts partial performance, and where that party prevents completion.
- 2
What is the doctrine of substantial performance?
Model answer
Where a party has performed the essential part of an entire obligation and only minor defects remain, that party may claim the contract price less the cost of putting the defects right.
- 3
What did Hoenig v Isaacs (1952) decide?
Model answer
A decorator who had completed the work on a flat apart from defects costing about fifty five pounds to remedy, on a contract price of seven hundred and fifty pounds, had substantially performed and recovered the price less that cost.
- 4
Why was there no substantial performance in Bolton v Mahadeva (1972)?
Model answer
The heating system gave off fumes and produced far too little heat, and the cost of putting it right was a large proportion of the contract price, so the central purpose of the work had not been achieved and nothing was payable.
- 5
How does a court decide whether performance has been substantial?
Model answer
The court compares the cost of remedying the defects with the contract price and asks whether the defects go to the root of what was promised, so a small proportion needing minor correction is substantial and a fundamental failure is not.
- 6
When does acceptance of partial performance entitle a party to payment?
Model answer
Where the other party had a genuine choice about whether to accept the incomplete performance and chose to take the benefit of it, a promise to pay a reasonable sum will be implied.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Contract: Discharge, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.