WJEC A-Level Law 603-1978-1
Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Dispute Resolution
The Criminal Process and the Criminal Courts
Legal Personnel and the Judiciary
Access to Justice and Funding
Tort: Rules and Theory
Tort: Negligence
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
Tort: Remedies
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Key Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: RestrictionsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection and ReformHuman rights
Contract: Rules and TheoryContract
Contract: FormationContract
Contract: TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and DuressContract
Contract: DischargeContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Restrictions
Trespass, harassment and actions against the police
- 3 things to know
- A2 Units 3 and 4
Overview
Trespass to land, false imprisonment and elements of malicious prosecution.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Define false imprisonment.
Why was there no false imprisonment in Bird v Jones (1845)?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
Define trespass to land.
Model answer
Trespass to land is direct and unjustifiable interference with land in the possession of another, and it is actionable without proof of any damage.
- 2
Define battery.
Model answer
Battery is the direct and intentional application of unlawful physical force to another person.
- 3
What did Collins v Wilcock (1984) decide?
Model answer
An officer who took hold of a woman's arm to detain her without arresting her committed a battery, because the contact went beyond the physical conduct generally acceptable in everyday life.
- 4
Define false imprisonment.
Model answer
False imprisonment is the unlawful and complete restraint of a person's freedom of movement, and it is actionable without proof of damage.
- 5
Must a person be aware of the restraint for false imprisonment to be committed?
Model answer
No, the tort is complete without the claimant's knowledge, although knowledge of the confinement is relevant to the level of damages.
- 6
Why was there no false imprisonment in Bird v Jones (1845)?
Model answer
The claimant was prevented from crossing a bridge in one direction but was free to go back the other way, and a partial obstruction is not the complete restraint the tort requires.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Human Rights: Restrictions, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.