WJEC A-Level Law 603-1978-1
Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Dispute Resolution
The Criminal Process and the Criminal Courts
Legal Personnel and the Judiciary
Access to Justice and Funding
Tort: Rules and Theory
Tort: Negligence
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
Tort: Remedies
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Key Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: RestrictionsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection and ReformHuman rights
Contract: Rules and TheoryContract
Contract: FormationContract
Contract: TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and DuressContract
Contract: DischargeContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Preliminary Offences
- 7 subtopics
- 21 things to know
- A2 Units 3 and 4
- Criminal Law, one of three A2 areas of which two are studied
What Criminal Law: Preliminary Offences covers
Criminal Law: Preliminary Offences is examined in A2 Units 3 and 4 — Criminal Law, one of three areas of which a student studies two. Unit 3 applies these rules to a scenario and Unit 4 evaluates them.. It covers attempt: the statutory definition and its scope, the actus reus: acts more than merely preparatory, applying the more than merely preparatory test to the cases, the mens rea of attempt, attempting the impossible, attempt, the completed offence and abandonment and evaluating the law on attempts and proposals for reform.
Where it is assessed
A2 Units 3 and 4
criminal law — one of three areas of which two are studied, applied in one paper and evaluated in the other.
Check the WJEC specification ↗The 7 subtopics
Each one has its own page.
- Attempt: the statutory definition and its scopeStatutory definition of attempt and inchoate offence.Open →
- The actus reus: acts more than merely preparatoryActus reus of attempt, last act test at common law and rubicon test.Open →
- Applying the more than merely preparatory test to the casesRecall questions on why Gullefer and Geddes fell short, what tipped Jones and Tosti over the line, confronting the intended victim, and the difficulty these cases cause the police.Open →
- The mens rea of attemptMens rea of attempt, distinction between the consequences and the circumstances of an offence and conditional intention.Open →
- Attempting the impossibleAttempting the impossible, factual impossibility that is still an attempt and conduct that a defendant wrongly believes to be criminal.Open →
- Attempt, the completed offence and abandonmentRecall questions on a change of mind after the line is crossed, the case for a withdrawal defence, charging in the alternative, and sentencing compared with the full offence.Open →
- Evaluating the law on attempts and proposals for reformRecall questions on criticisms of the current threshold, the proposed offence of criminal preparation, the intention required for attempted murder, the inconsistency in R v Khan, impossible attempts, and codification.Open →
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What practical difficulty does the more than merely preparatory test create for the police?
Which statute governs criminal attempts?
State the mens rea of attempt.
Distinguish factual impossibility from legal impossibility.
Why does the law give no defence of voluntary abandonment?
Why is the requirement of an intention to kill in attempted murder criticised?
What is an inchoate offence?
State the actus reus of attempt.
What tipped R v Tosti (1997) over the line?
What intention must be proved on a charge of attempted murder?
What does the Criminal Attempts Act 1981 provide about impossibility?
Give one argument for recognising a defence of voluntary withdrawal.
Give one argument in favour of requiring an intention to kill for attempted murder
Name three inchoate offences in English law.
Why did Parliament choose the words more than merely preparatory in the Criminal Attempts Act 1981?
How would a court treat a defendant caught climbing through a window with tools?
Why is the mens rea of attempted murder stricter than that of murder itself?
How are the defendant's beliefs treated where the facts make the offence impossible?
Give one argument against a defence of voluntary withdrawal.
Explain the criticism that the rule in R v Khan (1990) is inconsistent.
Take Criminal Law: Preliminary Offences further
The same content, four other ways.
Commonly confused
Pairs that lose marks when they are blurred together.
Attempt vs Conspiracy
Attempt: requiring an act going beyond preparation by the defendant. Conspiracy: complete on an agreement between two or more people.
Merely preparatory vs More than merely preparatory
Merely preparatory: getting ready to offend and attracting no liability. More than merely preparatory: embarking on the crime proper, which is enough for an attempt.
Factual impossibility vs Legal impossibility
Factual impossibility: arising where a fact the defendant did not know prevents completion, and is still punishable. Legal impossibility: arising where the intended conduct is not a crime, and is not punishable.
Questions from this topic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
Which statute governs criminal attempts?
Model answer
The Criminal Attempts Act 1981, which replaced the common law offence of attempt.
- 2
State the statutory definition of attempt.
Model answer
A person is guilty of attempting to commit an offence if, with intent to commit it, they do an act which is more than merely preparatory to the commission of the offence.
- 3
What is an inchoate offence?
Model answer
An inchoate offence is one committed before or without the completion of the substantive crime, so liability attaches to the incomplete criminal enterprise itself.
- 4
Name three inchoate offences in English law.
Model answer
Attempt, conspiracy, and encouraging or assisting an offence.
- 5
Why does the law punish attempts at all?
Model answer
A defendant who tries to commit an offence has shown the same intention and is often stopped only by chance, and punishing the attempt allows intervention before harm is done.
- 6
Which offences can be attempted?
Model answer
Attempt is available for indictable and either-way offences, so a purely summary offence cannot generally be attempted.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Criminal Law: Preliminary Offences revision questions
- What does Criminal Law: Preliminary Offences cover in WJEC A-Level Law?
- 7 subtopics: attempt: the statutory definition and its scope, the actus reus: acts more than merely preparatory, applying the more than merely preparatory test to the cases, the mens rea of attempt, attempting the impossible, attempt, the completed offence and abandonment and evaluating the law on attempts and proposals for reform. Each one has its own page with questions and model answers.
- How is Criminal Law: Preliminary Offences organised?
- By the WJEC 603-1978-1 specification, subtopic by subtopic, so it matches the order you are taught it in.
Every question in Criminal Law: Preliminary Offences, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.