levo

Tort: Occupiers' Liability

Evaluating occupiers' liability

  • 3 things to know
  • AS Unit 2

Overview

Argument that the law encourages defensive land management and reply to that argument.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

Give the argument that the occupiers' liability scheme is still too complex

Key term

How has the case law on obvious risks been received?

Evaluation

What is the reply to the argument that occupiers' liability law encourages a defensive, risk-averse response?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    Give the case that putting occupiers' liability in statute improved the law.

    Model answer

    It swept away the technical common law categories of entrant and replaced them with a single duty to visitors, which is clearer and fairer.

  2. 2

    Give the case that the statutory scheme is still too complex.

    Model answer

    A claimant must establish status, identify which Act applies and satisfy different conditions under each, so the categories that were abolished have partly returned.

  3. 3

    Give the argument that the 1984 Act goes too far.

    Model answer

    It requires an occupier to take care for a person who has no right to be on the land, and rewards unlawful entry with a claim.

  4. 4

    Give the argument that the 1984 Act does not go far enough.

    Model answer

    It covers personal injury only, imposes three preconditions before any duty arises, and offers little to an adult trespasser however grave the hidden danger.

  5. 5

    How has the case law on obvious risks been received?

    Model answer

    Approvingly by landowners and public authorities as restoring personal responsibility, and critically by those who say it leaves genuinely injured claimants without remedy.

  6. 6

    What is the argument that the law encourages defensive land management?

    Model answer

    That fear of claims leads occupiers to fence, close or over-sign land, reducing public access without materially improving safety.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

Roles v Nathan ( ).
196319411945

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AThe defendant owed the victim a duty of care and breached it.
BThe breach carried a reasonably foreseeable risk of death.
CThe breach caused the death.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Pecuniary loss is financial and measurable.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Tort: Occupiers' Liability, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.