WJEC A-Level Law 603-1978-1
Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Dispute Resolution
The Criminal Process and the Criminal Courts
Legal Personnel and the Judiciary
Access to Justice and Funding
Tort: Rules and Theory
Tort: Negligence
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
Tort: Remedies
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Key Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: RestrictionsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection and ReformHuman rights
Contract: Rules and TheoryContract
Contract: FormationContract
Contract: TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and DuressContract
Contract: DischargeContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
Evaluating occupiers' liability
- 3 things to know
- AS Unit 2
Overview
Argument that the law encourages defensive land management and reply to that argument.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
How has the case law on obvious risks been received?
What is the reply to the argument that occupiers' liability law encourages a defensive, risk-averse response?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
Give the case that putting occupiers' liability in statute improved the law.
Model answer
It swept away the technical common law categories of entrant and replaced them with a single duty to visitors, which is clearer and fairer.
- 2
Give the case that the statutory scheme is still too complex.
Model answer
A claimant must establish status, identify which Act applies and satisfy different conditions under each, so the categories that were abolished have partly returned.
- 3
Give the argument that the 1984 Act goes too far.
Model answer
It requires an occupier to take care for a person who has no right to be on the land, and rewards unlawful entry with a claim.
- 4
Give the argument that the 1984 Act does not go far enough.
Model answer
It covers personal injury only, imposes three preconditions before any duty arises, and offers little to an adult trespasser however grave the hidden danger.
- 5
How has the case law on obvious risks been received?
Model answer
Approvingly by landowners and public authorities as restoring personal responsibility, and critically by those who say it leaves genuinely injured claimants without remedy.
- 6
What is the argument that the law encourages defensive land management?
Model answer
That fear of claims leads occupiers to fence, close or over-sign land, reducing public access without materially improving safety.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Tort: Occupiers' Liability, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.