WJEC A-Level Law 603-1978-1
Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Dispute Resolution
The Criminal Process and the Criminal Courts
Legal Personnel and the Judiciary
Access to Justice and Funding
Tort: Rules and Theory
Tort: Negligence
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
Tort: Remedies
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Key Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: RestrictionsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection and ReformHuman rights
Contract: Rules and TheoryContract
Contract: FormationContract
Contract: TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and DuressContract
Contract: DischargeContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Defences
Intoxication by alcohol and by drugs
- 3 things to know
- A2 Units 3 and 4
Overview
Recall questions on the specific and basic intent divide, Majewski, drunken intent, the Dutch courage rule, Kingston on involuntary intoxication, prescribed drugs, and an intoxicated mistake about self-defence.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Distinguish specific intent from basic intent offences.
What happens to a defendant charged with murder who was too drunk to form any intention?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
Is intoxication a defence in its own right?
Model answer
No, intoxication is not a defence but evidence going to whether the defendant in fact formed the mens rea that the offence requires.
- 2
Distinguish voluntary from involuntary intoxication.
Model answer
Voluntary intoxication is where the defendant knowingly takes drink or drugs, while involuntary intoxication covers a spiked drink or an unexpected reaction to properly taken medication.
- 3
Distinguish specific intent from basic intent offences.
Model answer
A specific intent offence can only be committed intentionally, such as murder or theft, while a basic intent offence can be committed recklessly, such as battery or criminal damage.
- 4
What did DPP v Majewski (1977) decide?
Model answer
Voluntary intoxication may negate the mens rea of a specific intent offence, but it is no defence to a crime of basic intent, because becoming intoxicated is itself reckless conduct.
- 5
What happens to a defendant charged with murder who was too drunk to form any intention?
Model answer
The specific intent for murder is not proved, but the defendant will normally be convicted of manslaughter, which is the basic intent alternative.
- 6
How does R v Lipman (1970) illustrate that outcome?
Model answer
A man who killed his girlfriend while hallucinating on LSD lacked the intent for murder but was convicted of manslaughter.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Criminal Law: Defences, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.