levo

Criminal Law: Preliminary Offences

Attempting the impossible

  • 3 things to know
  • A2 Units 3 and 4

Overview

Attempting the impossible, factual impossibility that is still an attempt and conduct that a defendant wrongly believes to be criminal.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

Distinguish factual impossibility from legal impossibility.

Key term

What does the Criminal Attempts Act 1981 provide about impossibility?

Key term

How are the defendant's beliefs treated where the facts make the offence impossible?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What is meant by attempting the impossible?

    Model answer

    It describes a defendant who tries to commit an offence that cannot in fact be committed, because the intended victim, property or means make completion impossible.

  2. 2

    Distinguish factual impossibility from legal impossibility.

    Model answer

    Factual impossibility is where the facts make the offence unachievable, such as an empty pocket, while legal impossibility is where the conduct intended would not be a crime at all.

  3. 3

    What does the Criminal Attempts Act 1981 provide about impossibility?

    Model answer

    A person may be guilty of an attempt even though the facts are such that the commission of the offence is impossible.

  4. 4

    How are the defendant's beliefs treated where the facts make the offence impossible?

    Model answer

    The defendant is judged on the facts as they believed them to be, so a person who believes they are handling stolen goods intends the offence even though the goods are not stolen.

  5. 5

    Give an example of factual impossibility that is still an attempt.

    Model answer

    Putting a hand into an empty pocket intending to steal a wallet is attempted theft, because on the facts as the defendant believed them the offence would have been committed.

  6. 6

    Explain why stabbing a pillow in the belief that a person lies beneath it can be attempted murder.

    Model answer

    On the facts as the defendant believed them the act would have killed, so both the intention and an act beyond preparation are present.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

Roles v Nathan ( ).
196319411945

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AThe defendant owed the victim a duty of care and breached it.
BThe breach carried a reasonably foreseeable risk of death.
CThe breach caused the death.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Pecuniary loss is financial and measurable.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Criminal Law: Preliminary Offences, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.