WJEC A-Level Law 603-1978-1
Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Dispute Resolution
The Criminal Process and the Criminal Courts
Legal Personnel and the Judiciary
Access to Justice and Funding
Tort: Rules and Theory
Tort: Negligence
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
Tort: Remedies
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Key Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: RestrictionsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection and ReformHuman rights
Contract: Rules and TheoryContract
Contract: FormationContract
Contract: TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and DuressContract
Contract: DischargeContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Statutory Interpretation
The purposive approach and European influence
- 3 things to know
- AS Unit 1
Overview
Purposive approach to interpretation and position of European law in the United Kingdom following withdrawal.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
How did the House of Lords respond to Lord Denning's approach in Magor and St Mellons?
State the three conditions laid down in Pepper v Hart (1993) for consulting Hansard.
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
Define the purposive approach to interpretation.
Model answer
The court asks what result the legislation was intended to achieve and reads the words so as to achieve it, rather than confining itself to the literal text or to the gap in the earlier law.
- 2
How does the purposive approach differ from the mischief rule?
Model answer
The mischief rule looks backwards to the defect in the previous law, while the purposive approach looks forward to the object of the Act as a whole and may apply it to circumstances that did not exist when it was passed.
- 3
What did Lord Denning say the court should do when a statute is defective, in Magor and St Mellons Rural District Council v Newport Corporation?
Model answer
He said the court should fill in the gaps and make sense of the enactment rather than open it up to destructive analysis, an approach he applied in the Court of Appeal in 1950.
- 4
How did the House of Lords respond to Lord Denning's approach in Magor and St Mellons?
Model answer
Lord Simonds condemned it in 1952 as a naked usurpation of the legislative function, saying that where a gap is disclosed the remedy lies in an amending Act.
- 5
What was decided in R (Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health (2003)?
Model answer
Embryos created by cell nuclear replacement rather than by fertilisation fell within the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990, because the purpose was to regulate the creation of human embryos outside the body whatever technique produced them.
- 6
What was decided in Jones v Tower Boot Co (1997)?
Model answer
Racial harassment inflicted by fellow employees was held to be done in the course of employment, because reading that phrase as narrowly as the common law did would have defeated the statute's purpose of eliminating discrimination at work.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Statutory Interpretation, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.