levo

Judicial Precedent

Overruling, reversing and distinguishing

  • 3 things to know
  • AS Unit 1

Overview

Disapproving a decision and supreme Court overruling a settled line of authority.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

Illustrate distinguishing using Balfour v Balfour (1919) and Merritt v Merritt (1970).

Evaluation

Give the main criticism of distinguishing.

Key term

What is the effect of a decision being found to have been made per incuriam?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What is meant by overruling?

    Model answer

    Overruling is a court declaring that a legal rule laid down in an earlier and different case is wrong, so that the rule ceases to be law for the future and for past events alike.

  2. 2

    What is meant by reversing?

    Model answer

    Reversing is an appeal court changing the outcome of the very case before it, allowing the appeal and substituting a different decision for that of the court below.

  3. 3

    Distinguish overruling from reversing.

    Model answer

    Overruling concerns a rule established in an earlier, separate case, while reversing concerns the decision in the same case as it moves up on appeal.

  4. 4

    What is meant by distinguishing?

    Model answer

    Distinguishing is a court finding a material difference between the facts before it and those of an apparently binding case, so that the earlier ratio does not apply.

  5. 5

    Illustrate distinguishing using Balfour v Balfour (1919) and Merritt v Merritt (1970).

    Model answer

    Balfour held that a domestic arrangement between a couple living together was not intended to create legal relations, and Merritt was distinguished because the couple were already separated and put their agreement in writing, so it was enforceable.

  6. 6

    Why is distinguishing the most frequently used avoidance technique?

    Model answer

    It allows a court to avoid an unwelcome precedent without claiming any authority to abolish it, so unlike overruling it is available to every court in the hierarchy.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

Roles v Nathan ( ).
196319411945

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AThe defendant owed the victim a duty of care and breached it.
BThe breach carried a reasonably foreseeable risk of death.
CThe breach caused the death.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Pecuniary loss is financial and measurable.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Judicial Precedent, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.