WJEC A-Level Law 603-1978-1
Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Dispute Resolution
The Criminal Process and the Criminal Courts
Legal Personnel and the Judiciary
Access to Justice and Funding
Tort: Rules and Theory
Tort: Negligence
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
Tort: Remedies
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Key Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: RestrictionsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection and ReformHuman rights
Contract: Rules and TheoryContract
Contract: FormationContract
Contract: TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and DuressContract
Contract: DischargeContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Contract: Misrepresentation and Duress
Duress to the person and undue influence distinguished
- 3 things to know
- A2 Units 3 and 4
Overview
Duress to the person and undue influence.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
How has the law treated duress to goods?
How does presumed undue influence operate?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What is duress to the person?
Model answer
Duress to the person is actual or threatened violence to, or unlawful constraint of, a contracting party or someone close to them, used to force agreement to a contract.
- 2
What did Barton v Armstrong (1976) decide about causation in duress to the person?
Model answer
It decided that where death threats have been made, the contract may be set aside if the threats were a reason for entering it, even though the party would probably have signed anyway for commercial reasons.
- 3
Who bears the burden of proof once threats to the person are shown?
Model answer
The burden shifts to the party who made the threats to prove that they contributed nothing to the other party's decision to contract.
- 4
How does the causation test for economic duress differ from that for duress to the person?
Model answer
Duress to the person requires only that the threat was a reason for contracting, whereas economic duress requires the illegitimate pressure to have been a significant cause of the agreement.
- 5
How has the law treated duress to goods?
Model answer
Threats to seize or detain goods were historically not accepted as a ground for setting a contract aside, although money paid under such pressure could be recovered, and the category has largely been absorbed by the modern recognition of economic duress.
- 6
What is undue influence?
Model answer
Undue influence is an equitable doctrine allowing a transaction to be set aside where one party's consent was procured through the improper exploitation of influence arising from a relationship of trust and confidence.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Contract: Misrepresentation and Duress, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.