levo

Contract: Misrepresentation and Duress

Duress to the person and undue influence distinguished

  • 3 things to know
  • A2 Units 3 and 4

Overview

Duress to the person and undue influence.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

What did Barton v Armstrong (1976) decide about causation in duress to the person?

Key term

How has the law treated duress to goods?

Key term

How does presumed undue influence operate?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What is duress to the person?

    Model answer

    Duress to the person is actual or threatened violence to, or unlawful constraint of, a contracting party or someone close to them, used to force agreement to a contract.

  2. 2

    What did Barton v Armstrong (1976) decide about causation in duress to the person?

    Model answer

    It decided that where death threats have been made, the contract may be set aside if the threats were a reason for entering it, even though the party would probably have signed anyway for commercial reasons.

  3. 3

    Who bears the burden of proof once threats to the person are shown?

    Model answer

    The burden shifts to the party who made the threats to prove that they contributed nothing to the other party's decision to contract.

  4. 4

    How does the causation test for economic duress differ from that for duress to the person?

    Model answer

    Duress to the person requires only that the threat was a reason for contracting, whereas economic duress requires the illegitimate pressure to have been a significant cause of the agreement.

  5. 5

    How has the law treated duress to goods?

    Model answer

    Threats to seize or detain goods were historically not accepted as a ground for setting a contract aside, although money paid under such pressure could be recovered, and the category has largely been absorbed by the modern recognition of economic duress.

  6. 6

    What is undue influence?

    Model answer

    Undue influence is an equitable doctrine allowing a transaction to be set aside where one party's consent was procured through the improper exploitation of influence arising from a relationship of trust and confidence.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

Roles v Nathan ( ).
196319411945

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AThe defendant owed the victim a duty of care and breached it.
BThe breach carried a reasonably foreseeable risk of death.
CThe breach caused the death.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Pecuniary loss is financial and measurable.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Contract: Misrepresentation and Duress, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.