WJEC A-Level Law 603-1978-1
Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Dispute Resolution
The Criminal Process and the Criminal Courts
Legal Personnel and the Judiciary
Access to Justice and Funding
Tort: Rules and Theory
Tort: Negligence
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
Tort: Remedies
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Key Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: RestrictionsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection and ReformHuman rights
Contract: Rules and TheoryContract
Contract: FormationContract
Contract: TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and DuressContract
Contract: DischargeContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Statutory Interpretation
The literal rule
- 3 things to know
- AS Unit 1
Overview
Recall questions on the constitutional case for ordinary meaning, Whiteley v Chappell and Berriman, Parliament's response to Fisher v Bell, and the servants of the draftsman criticism.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What was decided in Whiteley v Chappell (1868)?
How did Parliament respond to the decision in Fisher v Bell?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
State the literal rule.
Model answer
Words in a statute must be given their plain, ordinary and grammatical meaning, even where the result is harsh or appears absurd.
- 2
Which classic judicial statement is quoted for the literal rule?
Model answer
Lord Esher said in R v Judge of the City of London Court (1892) that if the words of an Act are clear they must be followed, even though they lead to a manifest absurdity.
- 3
What is the constitutional justification for the literal rule?
Model answer
Parliament is sovereign and the judicial task is to apply the words it enacted, so keeping to the plain meaning leaves the making of policy with the elected body.
- 4
What was decided in Whiteley v Chappell (1868)?
Model answer
The defendant impersonated a dead man in order to vote, but the offence was impersonating any person entitled to vote and a dead person is not entitled to vote, so he was acquitted.
- 5
What was decided in London and North Eastern Railway Co v Berriman (1946)?
Model answer
A railwayman killed while oiling points was not covered by a regulation requiring a lookout for men relaying or repairing the track, because oiling was maintenance, so his widow recovered nothing.
- 6
What was decided in Fisher v Bell (1961)?
Model answer
A flick knife displayed in a shop window was an invitation to treat rather than an offer for sale under the Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act 1959, so the shopkeeper committed no offence.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Statutory Interpretation, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.