WJEC A-Level Law 603-1978-1
Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Dispute Resolution
The Criminal Process and the Criminal Courts
Legal Personnel and the Judiciary
Access to Justice and Funding
Tort: Rules and Theory
Tort: Negligence
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
Tort: Remedies
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Key Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: RestrictionsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection and ReformHuman rights
Contract: Rules and TheoryContract
Contract: FormationContract
Contract: TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and DuressContract
Contract: DischargeContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Key Convention Provisions
Balancing Article 8 against Article 10
- 3 things to know
- A2 Units 3 and 4
Overview
Recall questions on the four propositions in In re S, the public interest as against what interests the public, false public statements, photographs, Mosley and PJS, and press self-regulation.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
State the four propositions on balancing set out in In re S (A Child) (2004).
Distinguish the public interest from what happens to interest the public.
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
Why do Article 8 and Article 10 come into conflict?
Model answer
A publisher's freedom to inform and an individual's claim to be left alone pull in opposite directions, and because both are qualified rights each can justify limiting the other.
- 2
State the four propositions on balancing set out in In re S (A Child) (2004).
Model answer
Neither article takes precedence over the other; the court makes an intense focus on the comparative importance of the specific rights claimed; it examines the justification for interfering with each; and it applies proportionality to each, which is the ultimate balancing test.
- 3
What is usually the decisive question in a privacy injunction case?
Model answer
Whether the proposed publication makes a genuine contribution to a debate of general interest, as opposed to merely satisfying curiosity about somebody's private affairs.
- 4
Distinguish the public interest from what happens to interest the public.
Model answer
The public interest covers matters the community has a legitimate stake in knowing, such as wrongdoing or hypocrisy in public life, whereas mere appetite for detail about a private life justifies nothing.
- 5
How does a claimant's own false public statement affect the balance?
Model answer
A person who has publicly misrepresented their private conduct cannot complain that the press corrects the record, although the correction must not go further than that purpose requires.
- 6
What did Mosley v News Group Newspapers (2008) decide?
Model answer
Damages were awarded for misuse of private information because reporting an individual's private sexual activity, on facts disclosing no crime and no other impropriety, served no public interest at all.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Human Rights: Key Convention Provisions, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.