WJEC A-Level Law 603-1978-1
Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Dispute Resolution
The Criminal Process and the Criminal Courts
Legal Personnel and the Judiciary
Access to Justice and Funding
Tort: Rules and Theory
Tort: Negligence
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
Tort: Remedies
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Key Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: RestrictionsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection and ReformHuman rights
Contract: Rules and TheoryContract
Contract: FormationContract
Contract: TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and DuressContract
Contract: DischargeContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Property Offences
Robbery under section 8 of the Theft Act 1968
- 3 things to know
- A2 Units 3 and 4
Overview
Maximum sentence for robbery and mens rea of robbery.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Give the statutory definition of robbery.
What is the maximum sentence for robbery?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
Give the statutory definition of robbery.
Model answer
Section 8 provides that a person is guilty of robbery if they steal and, immediately before or at the time of doing so and in order to do so, use force on any person or put or seek to put any person in fear of being then and there subjected to force.
- 2
What is the maximum sentence for robbery?
Model answer
Robbery is an indictable-only offence carrying a maximum of life imprisonment.
- 3
Why must a complete theft be proved before there can be a robbery?
Model answer
Robbery is theft aggravated by force, so if any element of theft is missing the defendant cannot be convicted of robbery however much force was used.
- 4
How does R v Robinson (1977) show the dependence of robbery on theft?
Model answer
A man who used force to recover money he genuinely believed he was owed was not dishonest under section 2, so there was no theft and therefore no robbery.
- 5
How much force is required for robbery?
Model answer
The force need not be substantial, and R v Dawson and James (1976) left it to the jury as a question of fact whether nudging a man off balance amounted to force.
- 6
Can force applied only to property amount to robbery?
Model answer
Yes, R v Clouden (1987) held that wrenching a shopping basket from a woman's grip was force on the person, because the force was transmitted through the property she held.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Criminal Law: Property Offences, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.