levo

Criminal Law: Property Offences

Evaluating the law on theft, robbery and burglary

  • 3 things to know
  • A2 Units 3 and 4

Overview

Criticism that appropriation has been stretched too far, criticism that dishonesty is left to the jury and criticism of the range of conduct covered by robbery.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Evaluation

Explain the criticism that section 6 is obscurely drafted.

Evaluation

Give one argument in defence of the wide meaning of appropriation.

Evaluation

Give one argument for leaving dishonesty to the jury.

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    Explain the criticism that appropriation has been stretched too far.

    Model answer

    After Gomez and Hinks almost any dealing with property counts as an appropriation, even conduct the owner consented to, so the boundary of the offence depends almost entirely on dishonesty.

  2. 2

    Why is it troubling that theft can be committed by accepting a valid gift?

    Model answer

    The criminal law contradicts the civil law, because the recipient becomes the lawful owner and yet may be convicted of stealing the very thing they now own.

  3. 3

    Give one argument in defence of the wide meaning of appropriation.

    Model answer

    A wide external element with a dishonesty filter catches exploitation of vulnerable owners that a narrow, technical definition would let through.

  4. 4

    Explain the criticism that dishonesty is left to the jury.

    Model answer

    There is no legal definition of dishonesty, so different juries can reach different conclusions on similar facts and the outcome depends on the community standard each jury applies.

  5. 5

    Give one argument for leaving dishonesty to the jury.

    Model answer

    Dishonesty is a moral judgment that shifts with social attitudes, and a jury of ordinary people is better placed to make it than a fixed statutory formula.

  6. 6

    What improvement did Ivey v Genting Casinos (2017) make to the law?

    Model answer

    It aligned the criminal test with the civil one and removed a limb that allowed a defendant with distorted standards to argue they had not realised the conduct was dishonest.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

Roles v Nathan ( ).
196319411945

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AThe defendant owed the victim a duty of care and breached it.
BThe breach carried a reasonably foreseeable risk of death.
CThe breach caused the death.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Pecuniary loss is financial and measurable.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Criminal Law: Property Offences, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.