levo

Criminal Law: Defences

Self-defence and the prevention of crime

  • 3 things to know
  • A2 Units 3 and 4

Overview

Two sources of the defence of self-defence, two questions a jury must answer on self-defence and special rule for householders facing an intruder.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

Is the necessity of force judged subjectively or objectively?

Key term

Is the amount of force judged subjectively or objectively?

Key term

What is the effect of using excessive force in self-defence?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What are the two sources of the defence of self-defence?

    Model answer

    The common law defence of self-defence, and the statutory power under the Criminal Law Act 1967 to use reasonable force in the prevention of crime or in making an arrest.

  2. 2

    What are the two questions a jury must answer on self-defence?

    Model answer

    Whether the use of force was necessary on the facts as the defendant believed them to be, and whether the force actually used was reasonable in those circumstances.

  3. 3

    Is the necessity of force judged subjectively or objectively?

    Model answer

    The defendant is judged on the facts as they honestly believed them to be, so the belief in the need for force is assessed subjectively.

  4. 4

    What did R v Williams (Gladstone) (1987) decide about a mistaken belief?

    Model answer

    A man who wrongly believed he was stopping an assault when he intervened against a lawful arrest was entitled to be judged on the facts as he saw them, and his mistake did not have to be reasonable.

  5. 5

    Is the amount of force judged subjectively or objectively?

    Model answer

    The reasonableness of the force is judged objectively by the jury, although on the circumstances the defendant believed to exist.

  6. 6

    What allowance does the law make for a person acting in the heat of the moment?

    Model answer

    Evidence that the defendant did only what they honestly and instinctively thought necessary strongly supports the force being reasonable, because a person under attack cannot weigh the exact measure of defence.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

Roles v Nathan ( ).
196319411945

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AThe defendant owed the victim a duty of care and breached it.
BThe breach carried a reasonably foreseeable risk of death.
CThe breach caused the death.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Pecuniary loss is financial and measurable.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Criminal Law: Defences, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.