WJEC A-Level Law 603-1978-1
Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Dispute Resolution
The Criminal Process and the Criminal Courts
Legal Personnel and the Judiciary
Access to Justice and Funding
Tort: Rules and Theory
Tort: Negligence
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
Tort: Remedies
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Key Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: RestrictionsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection and ReformHuman rights
Contract: Rules and TheoryContract
Contract: FormationContract
Contract: TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and DuressContract
Contract: DischargeContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Tort: Negligence
Breach of duty and the reasonable man
- 3 things to know
- AS Unit 2
Overview
Recall questions on the objective standard, the learner driver in Nettleship v Weston, the Bolam test as qualified by Bolitho, the standard for a child defendant, and hindsight in Roe.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
How did Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority (1997) qualify Bolam?
What did Mullin v Richards concern?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What must a claimant show to establish breach of duty?
Model answer
That the defendant's conduct fell below the standard of care a reasonable person would have met in the circumstances.
- 2
Which case supplies the classic definition of the standard?
Model answer
Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks (1856).
- 3
Why is the standard described as objective?
Model answer
It asks what a reasonable person would have done, not what this defendant thought was reasonable or was capable of.
- 4
What did Nettleship v Weston (1971) decide about a learner driver?
Model answer
That a learner is judged by the standard of a reasonably competent qualified driver, with no allowance for inexperience.
- 5
What standard applies to a person exercising a professional skill?
Model answer
That of a reasonably competent member of that profession, not of the ordinary person.
- 6
State the test in Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee (1957).
Model answer
A professional is not negligent if they acted in accordance with a practice accepted as proper by a responsible body of opinion in that field.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Tort: Negligence, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.