levo

Tort: Negligence

Breach of duty and the reasonable man

  • 3 things to know
  • AS Unit 2

Overview

Recall questions on the objective standard, the learner driver in Nettleship v Weston, the Bolam test as qualified by Bolitho, the standard for a child defendant, and hindsight in Roe.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Numbers

Which case supplies the classic definition of the standard of care in negligence?

Key term

How did Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority (1997) qualify Bolam?

Key term

What did Mullin v Richards concern?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What must a claimant show to establish breach of duty?

    Model answer

    That the defendant's conduct fell below the standard of care a reasonable person would have met in the circumstances.

  2. 2

    Which case supplies the classic definition of the standard?

    Model answer

    Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks (1856).

  3. 3

    Why is the standard described as objective?

    Model answer

    It asks what a reasonable person would have done, not what this defendant thought was reasonable or was capable of.

  4. 4

    What did Nettleship v Weston (1971) decide about a learner driver?

    Model answer

    That a learner is judged by the standard of a reasonably competent qualified driver, with no allowance for inexperience.

  5. 5

    What standard applies to a person exercising a professional skill?

    Model answer

    That of a reasonably competent member of that profession, not of the ordinary person.

  6. 6

    State the test in Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee (1957).

    Model answer

    A professional is not negligent if they acted in accordance with a practice accepted as proper by a responsible body of opinion in that field.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

Roles v Nathan ( ).
196319411945

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AThe defendant owed the victim a duty of care and breached it.
BThe breach carried a reasonably foreseeable risk of death.
CThe breach caused the death.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Pecuniary loss is financial and measurable.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Tort: Negligence, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.