levo

Criminal Law: General Elements of Liability

Liability for omissions

  • 3 things to know
  • A2 Units 3 and 4

Overview

Recall questions on the duties that displace the general rule, Gibbins and Proctor, Stone and Dobinson, withdrawing treatment in Bland, and offences that cannot be committed this way.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

State the general rule about criminal liability for failing to act.

Evaluation

Give one argument for the general rule against liability for omissions.

Key term

Name three situations in which the law imposes a duty to act.

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    State the general rule about criminal liability for failing to act.

    Model answer

    English law imposes no general duty to act, so a person commits no offence by standing by and doing nothing unless a recognised duty applies.

  2. 2

    Give one argument for the general rule against liability for omissions.

    Model answer

    Punishing inaction would restrict individual liberty and could push bystanders into danger, and the law finds it easier to define what people must not do than what they must do.

  3. 3

    Name three situations in which the law imposes a duty to act.

    Model answer

    A duty arising from a contract, a duty arising from a special relationship such as parent and child, and a duty arising from voluntarily assuming responsibility for another person.

  4. 4

    Which case established a duty arising from a contract of employment?

    Model answer

    R v Pittwood (1902), where a level crossing gatekeeper left the gate open and was convicted of manslaughter after a cart was struck by a train.

  5. 5

    How does R v Gibbins and Proctor (1918) illustrate a duty from relationship?

    Model answer

    A father and his partner were convicted of murder after starving his daughter, because a parent owes a duty to feed and care for a child.

  6. 6

    What duty did R v Stone and Dobinson (1977) recognise?

    Model answer

    Having taken an ailing relative into their home and begun to care for her, the couple had voluntarily assumed a duty and were convicted of manslaughter when they allowed her to die.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

Roles v Nathan ( ).
196319411945

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AThe defendant owed the victim a duty of care and breached it.
BThe breach carried a reasonably foreseeable risk of death.
CThe breach caused the death.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Pecuniary loss is financial and measurable.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Criminal Law: General Elements of Liability, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.