WJEC A-Level Law 603-1978-1
Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Dispute Resolution
The Criminal Process and the Criminal Courts
Legal Personnel and the Judiciary
Access to Justice and Funding
Tort: Rules and Theory
Tort: Negligence
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
Tort: Remedies
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Key Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: RestrictionsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection and ReformHuman rights
Contract: Rules and TheoryContract
Contract: FormationContract
Contract: TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and DuressContract
Contract: DischargeContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of Liability
Liability for omissions
- 3 things to know
- A2 Units 3 and 4
Overview
Recall questions on the duties that displace the general rule, Gibbins and Proctor, Stone and Dobinson, withdrawing treatment in Bland, and offences that cannot be committed this way.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Give one argument for the general rule against liability for omissions.
Name three situations in which the law imposes a duty to act.
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
State the general rule about criminal liability for failing to act.
Model answer
English law imposes no general duty to act, so a person commits no offence by standing by and doing nothing unless a recognised duty applies.
- 2
Give one argument for the general rule against liability for omissions.
Model answer
Punishing inaction would restrict individual liberty and could push bystanders into danger, and the law finds it easier to define what people must not do than what they must do.
- 3
Name three situations in which the law imposes a duty to act.
Model answer
A duty arising from a contract, a duty arising from a special relationship such as parent and child, and a duty arising from voluntarily assuming responsibility for another person.
- 4
Which case established a duty arising from a contract of employment?
Model answer
R v Pittwood (1902), where a level crossing gatekeeper left the gate open and was convicted of manslaughter after a cart was struck by a train.
- 5
How does R v Gibbins and Proctor (1918) illustrate a duty from relationship?
Model answer
A father and his partner were convicted of murder after starving his daughter, because a parent owes a duty to feed and care for a child.
- 6
What duty did R v Stone and Dobinson (1977) recognise?
Model answer
Having taken an ailing relative into their home and begun to care for her, the couple had voluntarily assumed a duty and were convicted of manslaughter when they allowed her to die.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Criminal Law: General Elements of Liability, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.