WJEC A-Level Law 603-1978-1
Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Dispute Resolution
The Criminal Process and the Criminal Courts
Legal Personnel and the Judiciary
Access to Justice and Funding
Tort: Rules and Theory
Tort: Negligence
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
Tort: Remedies
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Key Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: RestrictionsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection and ReformHuman rights
Contract: Rules and TheoryContract
Contract: FormationContract
Contract: TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and DuressContract
Contract: DischargeContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Key Convention Provisions
Negative and positive obligations under Article 8
- 3 things to know
- A2 Units 3 and 4
Overview
Recall questions on the difference between the two kinds of duty, Von Hannover, Wainwright, the two-stage test for misuse of private information, Bloomberg LP v ZXC, and fair balance.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What did Wainwright v Home Office (2003) decide?
State the two-stage test in a claim for misuse of private information.
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What is a negative obligation under Article 8?
Model answer
It is the duty on the state and its agents to refrain from interfering with a person's private life, family life, home or correspondence.
- 2
What is a positive obligation under Article 8?
Model answer
It is the duty on the state to take reasonable steps to secure effective respect for the protected interests, including protection against interference by private individuals.
- 3
Which case first established that Article 8 imposes positive obligations?
Model answer
Marckx v Belgium (1979) held that the article requires the state to put in place measures securing effective family life, so a scheme that disadvantaged the child of an unmarried mother breached it.
- 4
What did X and Y v Netherlands (1985) decide?
Model answer
A gap in the criminal law that left a mentally disabled young woman unable to bring a complaint of sexual assault breached Article 8, because only criminal-law protection could provide effective deterrence.
- 5
Explain the positive obligation recognised in Von Hannover v Germany (2004).
Model answer
The state was required to protect an individual from relentless press photography of daily life, because images that contributed nothing to a debate of general interest served only to satisfy the curiosity of readers.
- 6
How has the positive obligation shaped English privacy law?
Model answer
English courts developed the existing action for breach of confidence into a claim for misuse of private information so that Article 8 would have an effective domestic remedy.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Human Rights: Key Convention Provisions, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.