WJEC A-Level Law 603-1978-1
Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Dispute Resolution
The Criminal Process and the Criminal Courts
Legal Personnel and the Judiciary
Access to Justice and Funding
Tort: Rules and Theory
Tort: Negligence
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
Tort: Remedies
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Key Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: RestrictionsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection and ReformHuman rights
Contract: Rules and TheoryContract
Contract: FormationContract
Contract: TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and DuressContract
Contract: DischargeContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Contract: Discharge
The effects of frustration and the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943
- 3 things to know
- A2 Units 3 and 4
Overview
Immediate effect of frustration on a contract and limitation of the rule established in Fibrosa.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What was the limitation of the rule established in Fibrosa v Fairbairn (1943)?
What is the immediate effect of frustration on a contract?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What is the immediate effect of frustration on a contract?
Model answer
The contract is automatically discharged from the moment of the frustrating event, so obligations falling due after that moment come to an end and neither party is liable for failing to perform them.
- 2
Why does frustration operate automatically rather than at the election of a party?
Model answer
Frustration is not a breach and neither party is at fault, so there is nothing for an innocent party to elect about, and allowing a choice would let a party keep alive a contract that has become something quite different.
- 3
What was the position at common law before the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943?
Model answer
The loss lay where it fell, so money already paid could not be recovered and money already due had to be paid, whatever the parties had received in return.
- 4
How did Fibrosa Spolka Akcyjna v Fairbairn Lawson Combe Barbour (1943) change the common law position?
Model answer
The House of Lords held that money paid in advance could be recovered where there had been a total failure of consideration, so the Polish company recovered its prepayment when the outbreak of war frustrated the machinery contract.
- 5
What was the limitation of the rule established in Fibrosa?
Model answer
Recovery depended on a total failure of consideration, so a payer who had received any part of what was promised recovered nothing, and the payee had to hand back the full sum even after incurring large expenses in performing.
- 6
What does section 1(2) of the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943 provide about money?
Model answer
Money paid before the frustrating event is recoverable and money then payable ceases to be payable, whether or not there has been a total failure of consideration.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Contract: Discharge, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.