WJEC A-Level Law 603-1978-1
Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Dispute Resolution
The Criminal Process and the Criminal Courts
Legal Personnel and the Judiciary
Access to Justice and Funding
Tort: Rules and Theory
Tort: Negligence
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
Tort: Remedies
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Key Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: RestrictionsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection and ReformHuman rights
Contract: Rules and TheoryContract
Contract: FormationContract
Contract: TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and DuressContract
Contract: DischargeContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Contract: Terms
Express terms, incorporation and the parol evidence rule
- 2 things to know
- A2 Units 3 and 4
Overview
Express term, red hand rule and parol evidence rule and two exceptions to it.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What did Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking (1971) decide about a term displayed inside a car park?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What is an express term?
Model answer
An express term is one the parties have themselves stated, in writing or orally, as part of their agreement.
- 2
State the three ways in which an express term may be incorporated into a contract.
Model answer
A term may be incorporated by signature of a contractual document, by reasonable notice given before or at the time of contracting, or by a consistent and regular course of dealing between the parties.
- 3
What did L'Estrange v Graucob (1934) decide about signing a contractual document?
Model answer
It decided that a party who signs a contractual document is bound by all its terms whether or not that party has read or understood them, in the absence of fraud or misrepresentation.
- 4
How did Curtis v Chemical Cleaning and Dyeing Co (1951) limit the effect of a signature?
Model answer
The assistant told the customer the clause covered only damage to beads and sequins, and that misrepresentation of the clause's effect prevented the cleaners from relying on the wider exclusion the customer had signed.
- 5
What did Olley v Marlborough Court (1949) decide about the timing of notice?
Model answer
It decided that a notice displayed in a hotel bedroom came too late to be incorporated, because the contract had already been concluded at the reception desk.
- 6
What did Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking (1971) decide about a term displayed inside a car park?
Model answer
It decided that the contract was made when the motorist put money into the machine and the ticket was issued, so conditions displayed on a pillar inside the car park were not incorporated.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Contract: Terms, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.