WJEC A-Level Law 603-1978-1
Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Dispute Resolution
The Criminal Process and the Criminal Courts
Legal Personnel and the Judiciary
Access to Justice and Funding
Tort: Rules and Theory
Tort: Negligence
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
Tort: Remedies
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Key Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: RestrictionsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection and ReformHuman rights
Contract: Rules and TheoryContract
Contract: FormationContract
Contract: TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and DuressContract
Contract: DischargeContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Defences
Automatism: insane and non-insane
- 3 things to know
- A2 Units 3 and 4
Overview
Recall questions on the internal and external distinction, how complete the loss of control must be, self-induced states, R v Hardie, the burden of proof, and the special verdict.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What is the essential difference between insane and non-insane automatism?
Give three external causes that have supported non-insane automatism.
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
Define automatism.
Model answer
Automatism is an act done by the muscles without any control by the mind, or an act done by a person who is not conscious of what they are doing; it is non-insane where an external cause brings it about and insane where the cause is internal.
- 2
Which case gave the classic definition of automatism?
Model answer
Bratty v Attorney General for Northern Ireland (1961) described it as an act done by the muscles without any control by the mind.
- 3
What is the essential difference between insane and non-insane automatism?
Model answer
Insane automatism arises from an internal cause and produces the special verdict, while non-insane automatism arises from an external cause and produces a complete acquittal.
- 4
Give three external causes that have supported non-insane automatism.
Model answer
A blow to the head, an injection of insulin, and the effect of an anaesthetic or of properly prescribed medication.
- 5
How much loss of control must the defendant show?
Model answer
There must be a total destruction of voluntary control, so impaired or merely reduced control is not enough.
- 6
Which case established that partial loss of control will not do?
Model answer
Attorney General's Reference (No 2 of 1992) held that a lorry driver who drove into a stationary vehicle in a trance-like state retained some control, so automatism failed.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Criminal Law: Defences, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.