levo

Criminal Law: Defences

Automatism: insane and non-insane

  • 3 things to know
  • A2 Units 3 and 4

Overview

Recall questions on the internal and external distinction, how complete the loss of control must be, self-induced states, R v Hardie, the burden of proof, and the special verdict.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

Distinguish the two forms of automatism by their cause and their verdict, with examples of each.

Key term

What is the essential difference between insane and non-insane automatism?

Key term

Give three external causes that have supported non-insane automatism.

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    Define automatism.

    Model answer

    Automatism is an act done by the muscles without any control by the mind, or an act done by a person who is not conscious of what they are doing; it is non-insane where an external cause brings it about and insane where the cause is internal.

  2. 2

    Which case gave the classic definition of automatism?

    Model answer

    Bratty v Attorney General for Northern Ireland (1961) described it as an act done by the muscles without any control by the mind.

  3. 3

    What is the essential difference between insane and non-insane automatism?

    Model answer

    Insane automatism arises from an internal cause and produces the special verdict, while non-insane automatism arises from an external cause and produces a complete acquittal.

  4. 4

    Give three external causes that have supported non-insane automatism.

    Model answer

    A blow to the head, an injection of insulin, and the effect of an anaesthetic or of properly prescribed medication.

  5. 5

    How much loss of control must the defendant show?

    Model answer

    There must be a total destruction of voluntary control, so impaired or merely reduced control is not enough.

  6. 6

    Which case established that partial loss of control will not do?

    Model answer

    Attorney General's Reference (No 2 of 1992) held that a lorry driver who drove into a stationary vehicle in a trance-like state retained some control, so automatism failed.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Law Making in Wales and the UK
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

Roles v Nathan ( ).
196319411945

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AThe defendant owed the victim a duty of care and breached it.
BThe breach carried a reasonably foreseeable risk of death.
CThe breach caused the death.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

Pecuniary loss is financial and measurable.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Criminal Law: Defences, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.